医院药学实践与科研结合的思路与方法-刘芳.pptVIP

＊ ＊ ＊ 结论 总疗效：两组比较差异无统计学意义 治疗椎基底动脉缺血：舒血宁疏血通 治疗合并高血糖的患者：疏血通舒血宁 治疗高同型半胱氨酸血症：舒血宁疏血通 系统评价 药物治疗的选择——两种或数种药物治疗的比较 同类药 非同类药 不同给药方案的比较 非说明书适应证的评价 药物安全性的评价 药物经济学的评价 * 左氨氯地平和氨氯地平用于高血压治疗的系统评价 Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2010;71:1–29 * 左氨氯地平 vs.氨氯地平 Conclusions: The majority of the clinical trials comparing (S)-amlodipine and racemic amlodipine treatment were low quality (12/15 [80%]). According to the limited evidence, there were no significant differences between (S)-amlodipine 2.5 mg and racemic amlodipine 5.0 mg in controlling BP. 左氨氯地平 vs.氨氯地平 When all the trials were considered, (S)-amlodipine tr