论法院不承担证明责任.pdfVIP

广西政法管理干部学院学报 JOURNAL OF GUANGXI ADMINISTRATIVE 第 29 卷第4 期 Vol.29.No.4 2014 年7 月 CADRE Il咽TITUTE OF POLmCS AND LAW July 2014 The Court does not Bear the Burden of Proof FANG-Yao ,SHA Wan-zhong ( Gansu Institute of Political Science and Law ,Gansu Lanzhou 730070) [Abstract] In recent years ，由e procedure law and began a new round of revision , the burden of proof and 由e burden of proof of the two is the academic debate for a long time the concept has become the focus of debate. Some scholars proposed court is the subject of the burden of proof，由e court shall bear the burden of proof in view. 币lis view , first , from the perspective of 由e subject of litigation proof , the court is not proof; second , the court found the responsibility is not the burden of proof; 由ird ，出e judicial personnels responsibility system and the criminal system is not a court in the absence of its adverse consequences after the proof responsibility. Why this article from the above three aspects of 出e court does not bear the burden of proof. [Keywords] The burden of proof; burden of proof; identi句;m同udged case investigation system; judge responsibility immunity 论法院不牙也提证明责任 方姚，沙万中 (甘肃政法学院公安技术学院，甘肃兰州 73∞70 ) [摘要]近年来，各大诉讼法又开始进行新一轮的 是不统一的，众说纷纭。学界对举证责任和证明责 修改，证明责任与举证责任这两个被学界争论已久的概念 任做了理论上了阶段区分理解，司法实务部门的 又成为了争辩的焦点。有的学者重新提出法院是证明责任 判决在发展初期又极不规范，这直接导致了理论 的主体，法院应当承担证明责任的观点。对此观点，第一、从 初学者以及实务界操作的困惑。对两者关系的论 诉讼证明的角度来看，法院不是证明的主体;第二，法院的 述，主要有以下几类观点