论约翰高尔斯华绥《友爱》中知识分子的困境.pdfVIP

English Abstract Abstract John Galsworthy (1867-1933) is one of the most excellent British Edwardian writers. He gained remarkable achievements and received the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1932 by The Forsyte Saga which is a series of family novel. Galsworthy revealed various moral problems by creating literature. He was regarded as humanitarian moralist by Conrad, a contemporary famous writer. Fraternity was published in 1909, which starts with Hilary’s and his wife’s marriage life and their prejudice of class. Saturday Review pointed out that Fraternity was a very dangerous and revolutionary book. It is nothing more or less than an insidious and embittered attack on our social system. However, John Batchelor, the British critic, emphasized that the people involved are London intellectuals who dabble in the arts and politics and have social conscience. Then, how do protagonists, the intellectuals, attack Edwardian social system in an insidious and embittered way? What emotional message does Galsworthy want to convey by naming the novel “fraternity”? Why do Hilary and Bianca have unhappy marriage in the field of family? Will the people in upper class eventually go into the poor people’s inner heart in the field of class? How do Mr. Stone and Mr. Purcey express their feelings and convey spiritual and ethical demands in the field of art? These questions will be analyzed one by one in the thesis. “Field” proposed by Pierre Bourdieu refers to “network” or “configuration” which is made up of social relationship. In this special network, Bourdieu is very concerned about the behavior of intellectuals. In Xu Ben’s view, the study on behavior of the intellectuals occupies a very important position in the intellectual field. “Threshold” proposed by Turner means “the door one can not cross”.