WTO环境下我国行政诉讼受案范围的研究论文.docVIP

　　WTO环境下我国行政诉讼受案范围的研究论文 ABSTRACT The study of revieinistrative actions, or the scope of judicial revieinistrative actions of the People’s Republic of China, has long time been the disputes and debates of scholars as inistrative litigation laore heated one and enlargement of the scope of judicial revieinistrative actions seems to be urgently necessary and unavoidable in China. Beginning eaning the concept “revieinistrative actions”, or “the scope of judicial revieinistrative actions”, the author of this paper has first discussed the essential value and function of administrative litigation, historical development of the scope of judicial revieinistrative actions in China; then he has briefly made a parative study of the topic inistrative actions in China , such as “abstract administrative actions”, “final administrative actions” and even “inner administrative actions” can inistrative actions is only the natural conclusion of the conception of “state ruled of lainistrative actions” seems to be only unnecessary and misleading; and last but not least, the author made a detailed study of the stipulations in ent and enlargement of the scope of judicial revieinistrative actions in China is both unavoidable and clear: to make amendments to the administrative litigation lainistrative actions”, “final administrative actions” and “inner administrative actions”;to delete detailed listing of “revieinistrative actions” and to establish the essential rule in administrative litigation that any administrative actions shall be judicially revieful to the principle of rule of lainistrative case la can be adopted by China to clarify confusions related inistrative actions），是行政诉讼中突出而重要的问题 。究其实质，乃是行政相对人在自己的合法权益遭受行政主体侵犯、或得不到行政主体的依法保护而产生行政争议以后，能否真正得到司法救济、维护自身合法权益的关键；同时，又是行政主体的行政行为（包括行政作为和行政不作为）是否被切实有效地置于司法监督之下，从而确保行政主体依法行政、实现行政法治乃至“依法治国”目标的关键。 我国现行行政诉讼受案范围存在诸多问题，如受案范围过窄、在列举方式上对不同案件类型的划分及标准不统一等 。究其原因.freelent, 类似于中国行政诉讼法第12条所规定的“（一）国防、外交等国家行为；” ）。也就是说，法国行政诉讼的受案范围，包括了除私人行为、立法机关的行为、外国机关的行为和以国家名