By Constructivist Learning Theory and Methods of Physical Education-毕业论文翻译.docVIP

By Constructivist Learning Theory and Methods of Physical Education-毕业论文翻译.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
By Constructivist Learning Theory and Methods of Physical Education-毕业论文翻译

By Constructivist Learning Theory and Methods of Physical Education Papers Keywords:: constructivism anchored scaffolding instruction teaching Random Access Instruction Abstract: Compared with traditional teaching mode, sports mode constructivist teaching teachers, students, teaching materials, too full body of the four elements of a breakthrough, the history of constructivist teaching are the main frame of teaching, throw the cat-type teaching, Random Access Instruction. Of course the use of constructivist physical education should be “because due to” the system should not die to move dogma. Constructivism believes that: the students get knowledge is not taught by teachers, but learners in certain contexts, namely, old knowledge or social background, with other people (including teachers and learning partners) to help with the necessary learning materials , students learn actively and creatively, by way of construction of meaning obtained. the development of modern information technology for constructivist learning environment provides the ideal cognitive tools that can more effectively promote the cognitive development of students. This article constructivist teaching model compared with the traditional teaching model, and explore the history of constructivist mode of teaching methods. First, the comparison of two teaching 1. Learning goal is deep understanding. From the goal of learning, the traditional teaching, knowledge acquisition is an important goal of learning, but there are different levels of knowledge acquisition, learners may only remember some of the concepts, principles, but did not really understand its meaning, or just have some understanding of the literal, can only meet the typical textbook exercises and so on. The construction of learning and teaching will have to form a deep understanding of knowledge, which means that learners who want to cut a knowledge theme or a subject’s core idea of the content to be able to make

文档评论(0)

wnqwwy20 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:7014141164000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档