- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
二外学习者使用学习策略情况对比研究
二外学习者使用学习策略情况对比研究摘要:本文研究了英语专业本科生和研究生在学习第二外语“日语”时所使用学习策略的差异。基于对调查问卷的分析,其各自特征如下:(1)在学习二外的过程中,英语专业研究生总体使用学习策略的频率略高于本科生;(2)针对各类学习策略,英语专业研究生的使用频率均高于本科生。作者提出了如何帮助本科生使用学习策略的建议
Abstract:The study is concerned with the learning strategies used by second foreign language (SFL) students, including two different groups―undergraduates and postgraduates majoring in English. The data is collected from the results of questionnaire modified on the base of Oxford’s Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). With the basis of data analysis, the features of the two groups in using learning strategies are as following: (1) postgraduates use more learning strategies than undergraduates although the total tendency seemed the same. (2) The mean of each learning strategy used by postgraduates is higher than undergraduates. Then the study proposes several suggestions for the SFL students in the using language learning strategies in the future.
关键词:学习策略 二外 日语
Keywords:learning strategies second foreign language Japanese
1 Introduction
In most of the research on language learning strategies, the primary concern has been on “identifying what good language learners report they do to learn a second or foreign language.” In 1966, Aaron Carton published his study entitled The Method of Inference in Foreign Language Study, which was the first attempt on learner strategies. Research conducted by Naiman et al. (1978) focused on personality traits, cognitive styles and strategies that were critical to successful language learning. Then Rubin (1981) classified strategies in terms of processes contributing directly or indirectly to language learning. Chamot and O?Malley (1987) provide the first clear contrast between cognitive and metacognitive strategies. Politzer and McGroarty (1985) compared self-report of strategies use to the development of linguistic and communicative competence. These researches provide important leads for future research in learners? language learning strateg
原创力文档


文档评论(0)