电针及中医药在前列腺增生临床治疗中功效对比探究.doc

电针及中医药在前列腺增生临床治疗中功效对比探究[摘要] 目的 比较电针治疗与中医药治疗在前列腺增生治疗中的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析40例电针治疗和40例中医药治疗患者的临床资料。结果 电针治疗组患者I-PSS、PVR、BS、夜尿次数、24h憋尿困难次数等五项观察指标明显低于中医药治疗组患者，其Qmax值明显高于中医药治疗组患者，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05），而两组间前列腺体积差异不明显。结论 与中医药治疗相比，电针治疗前列腺增生的临床效果更佳。 [关键词] 前列腺增生；电针；中医药 [中图分类号] R246 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701（2011）31-63-02 The Efficacy of Cupping Treatment and Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Clinical Treatment of Prostate Hyperplasia WANG Xiaowu SHEN Weiliang YAO Xingrong Deqing County People’s Hospital in Zhejiang Province, Deqing 313216, China [Abstract] Objective To compare the clinical effect of the traditional Chinese medicine and cupping treatment in the treatment of prostate hyperplasia. Methods Reviewed retrospectively the clinical data of the 40 cases with cupping treatment and 40 cases with traditional Chinese medicine treatment. Results The I-PSS, PVR, BS, nocturia number, times of 24 h urine difficulty to suppress of patients in cupping treatment group were significantly lower than those of patients in traditional Chinese medicine group, the Qmax value is obviously higher than that of patients in traditional Chinese medicine group, the above differences were all significant in statistics (P＜0.05), and there was no obvious difference between the prostate volume of patients in two groups. Conclusion Compared to traditional Chinese medicine treatment, cupping treatment has better curative effects in treating prostate hyperplasia. [Key words] Prostate hyperplasia; Cupping treatment; Chinese medicine 人体前列腺分内外两层：内层为尿道周围的黏膜和黏膜下腺体；外层为前列腺体。后者构成前列腺的主体，两层之间有纤维膜隔开。前列腺增生主要发生在内层，在膀胱颈至精阜一段后尿道的腺体间质中，其多发生在中老年男性群体中[1]。本文通过本院的临床资料以及相关的文献研究，将电针治疗和中医药治疗这两种在前列腺增生治疗中常用的方法进行比较分析，现报道如下。 1 资料与方法 1.1 一般资料 选取2010年5月～2011年5月于我院诊断为前列腺增生患者80例，年龄55～83岁，平均（75.36±3.25）岁，平均I-PSS为（18.57±3.39）分，平均Qmax为（8.67±2.39）mL/s，平均PVR为（102.25±11.35）mL，平均BS为（5.98±3.27）分，平均前列腺体积（39.58±11.34）cm3，平均夜尿次数为（4.01±1.78）次，平均24h憋尿困难次数为（4.08±1.93）次。所有患者均有不同程度的血尿、排尿困难和尿痛等症状，随机分为电针治疗组（40例）和中医药治疗组（40