[转载]教师应具备的教育教学新理念（Teacher should have the new idea of education and teaching）.doc

[转载]教师应具备的教育教学新理念（Teacher should have the new idea of education and teaching） Teacher should have the new idea of education and teaching 1, knowledge education depends on indoctrination, and humanistic education relies on edification. Some of the advantages of 2, Chinas education (students computing ability strong), modern technology can be replaced, and some problems existing in the education of our (students innovation ability), modern technology is unable to replace. This is the main reason why our education urgently needs reform. 3, our teacher to remember: there is no cure all diseases and no cure diseases of a ready-made panacea, the education will never be the same clone a ready-made panacea, the art of education or a method from there a successful teacher to implement successful education to their students. If that were the case, the world would be a world of leaders, statesmen, scientists, poets, bankers, entrepreneurs, and millionaires, and the world would not be able to exist. 4, education should not be for only a small number of students, nor for most students, but for every student. 5, we should not one-sided understanding of the school is to the development of students, teachers and students development because the development is a dialectical unity, the development of teachers can better promote the development of students, teachers and students to give up the pursuit of development, the development of the students eventually can only be a castle in the air. 6, actors and actors to conquer the audience by acting; players rely on skills to retain fans; teachers rely on comprehensive quality to lead students towards a better future. 7, incompetent teachers in teaching let students adapt to themselves, with knowledge to students; and excellent teachers in teaching is to adapt themselves to students, with students to knowledge. The former is to teach people to fish, and the latter to teach people to fish. 8, the real ability of teachers, is not whether he