government information difficult judicial relief system（政府信息困难的司法救济制度）.docVIP

下载本文档

0
0
约8.02千字
约 8页
2017-09-06 发布于浙江
举报
版权申诉

government information difficult judicial relief system（政府信息困难的司法救济制度）.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

government information difficult judicial relief system（政府信息困难的司法救济制度）

Government Information Difficult judicial relief system Abstract When the May 1, 2008 lt;lt;Republic of China on Open Government Informationgt;gt; (hereinafter referred to as “Regulations” came into effect, the public expect lt;lt;Ordinancegt;gt; implementation to government information for citizens of the right to provide legal protection. However, the lt;lt;Ordinancegt;gt; since the implementation over the “first case” have encountered information is not public, the embarrassment of not filing lawsuits. Keywords relief to know government information lt;lt;Ordinancegt;gt; implementation, Hunan Rucheng yellow by pinching, Deng Bosong five people submitted to the county government lt;lt;government information applicationgt;gt; to request County Water Company announced the restructuring of the original investigation report, but the obstacles . After Huang Jian, who by the court filed a lawsuit to the people, which is lt;lt;Ordinancegt;gt; address since the implementation of the country’s first “Government information is not public,” the administrative case. But insisted that the investigation report Rucheng County only for the leadership of reference, not a range of information disclosure. The court held that five people do not have the legal qualification. The report also did not damage their interests, and in the case “relating to enterprise restructuring issues, does not belong to the scope of administrative litigation,” the grounds of inadmissibility. ① Reflect the above case: First, the government clearly defined the scope of information disclosure, lt;lt;Ordinancegt;gt; the second chapter of the type of information should be made publicly listed yet lt;lt;Bill, “this provision is very vague statement in fact, all levels of government by numerous things to do compared to lt;lt;Ordinancegt;gt; type in the information disclosure statement under the general, citizens in a specific application for public information, they can not find exactly cor