a methodological framework for evaluating the evidence for complementary and alternative medicine (cam) for cancer方法论的框架来评估的证据补充和替代医学(cam)癌症.pdfVIP

下载本文档

2
0
约6.29万字
约 16页
2017-09-07 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

a methodological framework for evaluating the evidence for complementary and alternative medicine (cam) for cancer方法论的框架来评估的证据补充和替代医学(cam)癌症.pdf

1、本文档共16页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

a methodological framework for evaluating the evidence for complementary and alternative medicine (cam) for cancer方法论的框架来评估的证据补充和替代医学(cam)癌症

Cancers 2011, 3, 773-788; doi:10.3390/cancers3010773 OPEN ACCESS cancers ISSN 2072-6694 /journal/cancers Article A Methodological Framework for Evaluating the Evidence for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) for Cancer Robert Zachariae 1 and Helle Johannessen 2,* 1 Psychooncology Research Unit, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, and Department of Psychology, University of Aarhus, Jens Chr. Skous Vej 4, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark; E-Mail: bzach@aarhus.rm.dk 2 Research Unit Health, Man Society, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, JB Winsløws Vej 9B, 5000 Odense C, Denmark * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: hjohannessen@health.sdu.dk; Tel: +45 6550 3647; Fax: +45 6550 3682. Received: 24 January 2011; in revised form: 5 February 2011 / Accepted: 21 February 2011 / Published: 23 February 2011 Abstract: In spite of lacking evidence for effects on cancer progression itself, an increasing number of cancer patients use various types of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). There is disagreement between CAM practitioners, researchers and clinical oncologists, as to how evidence concerning effects of CAM can and should be produced, and how the existing evidence should be interpreted. This represents a considerable challenge for oncologists; both in terms of patient needs for an informed dialogue regarding CAM, and because some type