- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
TST加微创手工处理术及传统外剥内扎术治疗环状混合痔治疗措施
TST加微创手工处理术及传统外剥内扎术治疗环状混合痔治疗措施
[摘要] 目的 比较TST加微创手工处理术和传统外剥内扎术治疗环状混合痔的临床效果,探讨临床有效治疗环状混合痔的手术方法,为环状混合痔的临床治疗和相关研究提供借鉴、依据。 方法 选取2010年12月~2012年4月本院收治的环状混合痔患者172例为研究对象,将患者随机分为TST手术组和传统手术组,每组各86例,分别实[毕业论文 网专业提供代写医学论文的服务,欢迎光临www ..com]施TST加微创手工处理术和传统外剥内扎术,比较两组的临床疗效、住院时间、住院费用。 结果 TST手术组中,痊愈82例(95.35%),显效3例(3.49%),有效1例(1.16%),无效0例,传统手术组中,痊愈71例(82.56%),显效13例(15.12%),有效2例(2.32%),无效0例,TST手术组的治疗效果优于传统手术组,差异有统计学意义(z=-2.646,P=0.008)。TST手术组的住院时间明显短于传统手术组,住院费用明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P均lt;0.05)。 结论 TST加微创手工处理术治疗环状混合痔的临床效果显著,是临床治疗环状混合痔的理想、可靠的选择。
[关键词] TST;微创手工处理;传统外剥内扎术;环状混合痔
[中图分类号] R657.1+8 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2014)11(c)-0038-03
[Abstract] Objective To compare the clinical effect of TST combined with minimally invasive operation of manual processing and traditional external dissection and internal ligation surgery in the treatment of circumferential mixed hemorrhoids,to investigate the reliable method of clinical effective treatment of circumferential mixed hemorrhoids,so as to provide reference,basis for the clinical treatment of circumferential mixed hemorrhoids and the related research. Methods 172 patients with circumferential mixed hemorrhoids treated in our hospital from December 2010 to April 2012 were selected as the study objects,and they were were randomly divided into the TST operation group (n=86) and traditional operation group (n=86),they were respectively given the TST combined with minimally invasive operation of manual processing and traditional external dissection and internal ligation surgery,the clinical curative effect,the hospitalization time and cost in the two groups were compared. Results In the TST operation group,82 cases were cured (95.35%),3 cases (3.49%) were marked effective,1 case (1.16%) was effective,having no invalid cases,while in the traditional operation group,it was respectively 71 cases (82.56%),13 cases (15.12%),2 cases (2.32%),0 cases,the treatment effect in the TST operation group was better than the traditional operation group,and ther
文档评论(0)