routine versus needs-based mri in patients with prolonged low back pain a comparison of duration of treatment, number of clinical contacts and referrals to surgery常规和以需求为基础的mri长期腰痛患者治疗时间的比较,临床联系和推荐手术的数量.pdfVIP

routine versus needs-based mri in patients with prolonged low back pain a comparison of duration of treatment, number of clinical contacts and referrals to surgery常规和以需求为基础的mri长期腰痛患者治疗时间的比较,临床联系和推荐手术的数量.pdf

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
routine versus needs-based mri in patients with prolonged low back pain a comparison of duration of treatment, number of clinical contacts and referrals to surgery常规和以需求为基础的mri长期腰痛患者治疗时间的比较,临床联系和推荐手术的数量

Jensen et al. Chiropractic Osteopathy 2010, 18:19 /content/18/1/19 RESEARCH Open Access Routine versus needs-based MRI in patients with prolonged low back pain: a comparison of duration of treatment, number of clinical contacts and referrals to surgery Rikke K Jensen1,2*, Manniche Claus1,2, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde1,2 Abstract Background: The routine use of radiology is normally discouraged in patients with low back pain (LBP). Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) provides clinicians and patients with detailed knowledge of spinal structures and has no known physical side effects. It is possible that insight into the pathological changes in LBP patients could affect patient management. However, to our knowledge, this has never been tested. Until June 2006, all patients at our specialised out-patient public clinic were referred for MRI on the basis of clinical indications, economic constraints, and availability of MRI (the “needs-based MRI” group). As a new approach, we now refer all patients who meet certain criteria for routine up-front MRI before the clinical examination (the “routine MRI” group). Objectives: The aims of this study were to investigate if these two MRI approaches resulted in differences in: (1) duration of treatment, (2) number of contacts with clinicians, and (3) referral for surgery. Design: Comparison of two retrospective clinical cohorts. Method: Files were retrieved from consecutive patients in both groups. Criteria for referral were: (1) LBP or leg pain of at least 3 on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale, (2) duration of present symptoms from 2 to12 months and (3) age above 18 years. A comparison was made between the “needs-based MRI” and “routine MRI” groups on the outcomes of duration of treatment and use of resources. Results: In all, 169 “needs-based MRI” and 208 “routine MRI” patient fi

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

xyz118 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档