复杂科学视域下体育学定量及定性探究差异及整合.docVIP

复杂科学视域下体育学定量及定性探究差异及整合摘要：运用文献资料法、逻辑分析法等研究方法，分析了定量和定性研究各自的原理和不足。其中，定量研究崇尚工具理性，一般采用统计技术，考察体育现象量的规律性，从而把握体育现象的性质，其主要的不足包括：忽视了体育现象的特殊性、人文性不足、研究结果可能失真、研究价值比较有限；定性研究是一种探索性研究，崇尚价值理性，一般采用自然主义态度，追求对体育现象的潜在的理由和动机的质的理解，其主要的不足包括：易导致相对主义、研究效度不高、研究结果难以检验。结果表明体育学的定量研究和定性研究之间具有整合的可行性和必要性，应该打破研究范式的二元对立，走向相互整合的研究范式，实现体育学研究方法论的突破。文章提出了应然形态的6种具体整合方法。 关键词：体育学；范式；定量研究；定性研究；复杂科学；差异；整合 中图分类号：G80-32 文献标识码：A 文章编号：1007-3612(2010)12-0015-05 Difference between the Quantitative and Qualitative Research and Integrationin Sports Science in the Horizon of the Complex Science HU Yong?hong?1，ZHOU Deng?song?2 （1. College of Physical Education, Shaoguan University, Shaoguan 512005, Guangdong China； 2. Postgraduate Department, Capital Institute of Physical Education, Beijing 100088, China) Abstract:By the method of documentation and logistic analysis, the paper reviews the principle and weakness of the quantitative and qualitative analysis. The quantitative research advocates instrumental rationality. It studies the regularity of the amount of sports phenomenon by the statistical techniques so as to grasp the nature of the sport phenomenon. Its main shortages include：ignoring the specificity of the sports phenomenon，lacking literature consideration and its results may be distorted. The research value is relatively limited. The qualitative research is a kind of exploratory study and advocates the value rationality. It aims to explore the qualitative understanding to the underlying reasons and motives of sports phenomenon by naturalistic attitude. Its main shortages include being apt to lead to the relativism. The research validity is not high and the results are difficult to test. The results show that there is a feasibility and necessity to integrate between the two paradigms and we should break away the dual contradiction and lead integrated model, thus realize the breakthrough of sports science methodology. And it puts forward six detailed integration ways to achieve it. Key