所有argument题目提纲.doc

Argument1 The argument fails to provide evidence to prove that the residents in Plainsville will prefer heath food. Lacking the reason why their stores are most profitable in areas where residents are highly concerned their health, we can’t decide they will get profit in Plainsville The arguer fails to take other factors which will influence their business into account. Argument2 A threshold assumption upon which the recommendation relies is that Brookville homeowners implemented Brookville’s restrictions in the first place. Even assuming that Brookville homeowners implemented these restrictions, the committee relies on the additional assumption that this course of action was responsible for the increase in Brookville property values. (C.E) Even assuming that Brookville’s rising property values are attributable to the implementation of these restrictions, the committee fails to consider possible differences between Brookville and Deerhaven that might help to bring about a different result for Deerhaven. (F.A) Argument3 The arguer fails to establish the causal relationship between the decrease of graduates who went to work at large firm and the graduates’ interest. (C.E) The arguer’s the survey provides few information about his argument because his sample is not representative and too limited. This assert fail to define what job satisfaction is. Argument4 1. We don’t have any evidence suggesting that more real estate agents will cause the result that A is superior to F. 2. Moreover, high revenue and high average price of house is not enough to conclude that A is superior to F. 3. The arguer fails to consider that other differences in the nine years. Argument5 The arguer fails to establish the causal relationship between the increase of people with arthritis and the big profits in pharmaceutics. No evidence is provided to prove that the profits of X will decrease. The sample of the survey about the Xylan is not representative so we can’t decide that Xylan will obtain