病房整体护理对职业病的影响.docVIP

精品论文 参考文献 病房整体护理对职业病的影响 刘娟 魏红蕾 成超 山东省市立医院 通讯作者：李朝霞 266109 【摘要】目的：对比分析对职业病患者分别采用病房整体护理和常见的普通护理所具有研究价值及临床影响。方法：将我院收治的90例职业病患者，按照抛硬币的方式随机分为观察组和对照组，平均每组患者45例。观察组患者采用病房整体护理的方式；对照组患者采用常见的普通护理方式。比较两组患者对相应护理的满意程度及两组患者在医院的住院花销、住院时间。结果： 通过观察组和对照组的比较可以看出，观察组患者对病房整体护理的满意度（95.55%）明显比对照组患者对常见的普通护理的满意度（67.78%）高，具有统计学意义(Plt;0.05)。观察组患者的住院时间（81.92plusmn;1.03天）、住院花销（3.02plusmn;0.72万元）明显比对照组患者住院时间（139.02plusmn;1.82天）、住院花销（6.02plusmn;0.81万元）低，具有统计学意义(Plt;0.05)。结论：对职业病患者实施病房整体护理具有一定的研究价值及良好的临床结果，并且具有病情康复快、住院费用低等特点，深受患者及家属的青睐与支持，值得在临床上推广与运用。 【关键词】病房整体护理、普通护理、职业病、临床结果 Influence of ward holistic nursing on occupational disease [Abstract] Objective: To compare and analyze research value and clinical significance of ward holistic nursing on occupational disease.Methods: 90 occupational disease patients in our hospital were randomly divided into observation group and control group in accordance with the toss of a coin , with 45 cases each group.Observation group was treated with ward holistic nursing; Control group were treated with common nursing. Compared two groupsrsquo; satisfaction with nursing, hospital costs and length of hospital stay. Results: Through the comparison ,observation grouprsquo;s nursing satisfaction (95.55%) was significantly better than the control grouprsquo;s (67.78%), with statistical significance (Plt;0.05). Hospitalization time of observation group (81.92 + / - 1.03 days), hospitalization expenses (3.02 + 7200) were significantly higher than control grouprsquo;s hospitalization time (139.02 + 1.82 days) and hospitalization expenses (6.02 + 8100), with statistical significance (Plt;0.05). Conclusion:Implementation of holistic nursing ward has certain research value and good clinical outcome for patients with occupation disease,it can make patients quickly recovery and has low expense of hospitalization, this kind of method is supported by patients and their families which is worthy of promotion and application in clinical practice. [Keyword]Ward nursing, Nursing