- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
国有、民营混合参股与公司绩效改进.doc
国有、民营混合参股与公司绩效改进
郝阳糞六堂
国家外汇管理局中央外汇业务中心北京大学光华管
理学院
本文以2004—2014年屮国A股上市公司为样本,考察丫国有和民营参股股东对 公司绩效的影响及其作用机制。实证结果显示,“混合所有”的股权结构提高了 公司绩效,但国有资本之间的股权多元化对公司绩效没有正面影响。进一步研究 发现,民营参股增强了国企管理层的薪酬和离职对业绩的敏感度,国有参股减 轻了民企的税负和融资约束,并且在市场化越低时异质性参股股东对缋效的影 响越积极。这一结果表明,在屮国这一转型经济体屮,“混合所有”有助于弥补 市场化的不足,异质性股东的“互补”使企业发挥了不同所有制资本的优势, 但需耍避免在改革中引入新的不平等或低效率。本文对混合所有制改革提供了重 要依据,也为公同治理领域提供了中国的独特案例。
关键词:
国有参股;民营参股;公司治理;混合所有制;
郝阳,电子信箱:
haoyang@ma.il. rmd-safc. gov. cn,
pkuhaoyang@163. com;
巽六堂,电子信箱:ltgong@gsm. pku. edu. cn。
State and Private Non-controlling Shareholders in SOEs and Private Firms, and Firm Performance
Hao Yang Gong LiutangInvestment CentereState Admniistration of
Foreign Exchange; Guanghua Management School, Peking University;
Abstract:
There are two key features of transitioning economies:the prevalence of state ownership and the progress of marketization. This study investigates the effect of non-controlling state and private shareholders on firm performance, and links these effects to the level of market izat ion. A large stream of corporate governance research investigating the effects of non-controlling shareholders (NCS) on firm performance has been produced over the past 20 years. We argue that the identities of the NCS and the institutional environment arc important to shaping outcomes attributable to the presence of the NCS. The management of SOEs (i. e., where the controlling shareholder is state-owned) is generally less marketed than that of private firms due to the government’s probable choice of social and political policy goals over profit maximization and its greater information asymmetries. As a result,in SOEs, privately owned NCS generate value because they have the incentives and voting power to constrain the political objectives of the controlling state-owned shareholder. Conversely, private firms often face unequal treatment in financing and taxation in 1 ess market!zed economies. State-owned NCS can bring political connections to private firms, help overcome market and
文档评论(0)