期刊评价4个核心指标之间关系的探讨.doc

期刊评价4个核心指标之间关系的探讨 黄明睿 南京农业大学畜牧兽医编辑部 为了探讨期刊评价指标载文量、总被引频次、影响因子和综合评价总分之间的相 互关系，采用文献计量法和统计学方法，以中国科学技术信息研宄所《2014年 版屮国科技期刊引证报告（核心版）》的数据为依据，用统计分析软件spss 19.0对各类期刊的4个指标进行统计分析。结果发现载文量与总被引频次为正 相关，载文量与影响因子、综合评价总分在物理类呈止相关，但在农业综合类和 农业工程类、临床医学综合类、化学工程综合类、电子技术类、计算机科学技术 类显示不相关:总被引频次、影响因子、综合评价总分三者之间呈正相关，尤其 是影响因子与综合评价总分之间高度相关。说明总被引频次、影响因子、综合评 价总分三者之间相互影响，在期刊评价中起着主要作用。此外，适当的载文量有 利于提高被引用率。研宄结果为期刊提高影响力提供参考。 关键词： 评价指标;载文量;总被引频次;影响因子;综合评价总分;相关性; 黄明睿（1963-）,女，副编审，研允方向:编辑出版学。 2017-05-22 基金：南京农业大学中央高校基木科研业务费人文社科基金（SK2015020） Discussion on the Relationship among four core Evaluation Indexes of Periodical HUANG MingruiEdj^orial Denartment of AnhnalHu^bandry and Veterinary Medicine， Nanjing Agricultural University; Abstract： In order to research the relationship among the periodical evaluation indexes including paper quantity, total cited frequency, impact factor and comprehensive evaluation score. Literature measurement and statistical methods were used to analyzed the four indexes with SPSS 19. 0 based on the data from 2014 Chinas Science and Technology Journal Citation Reports (Core) by Science and Technology Information Research Institute of China. The results showed that the amount of published articles were positive related to the cited frequency; the number and impact factor and comprehensive evaluation score in physics were positively correlated, but in agriculture and agricultural engineering, clinical medicine, electronic technology, computer science and technology showed no correlation; the ci ted frequency, impact factor and comprehensive evaluation score were positively correlated， especially between impact factor and comprehensive evaluation score. It illustrated that cited frequency, impact factor and comprehensive evaluation score influenced each other, and played a major role in the periodical evaluation. Tn addition, the appropriate number was in favour of improving cited frequency, which provided reference for periodicals to improve influence. Keyword： evaluation index; paper