Argument闪光句型 - 副本.doc

Argument闪光句型1.? ? ? ? The mere(纯粹的，起码的，仅仅的) fact that ticket sales in recent years for screenplay（电影剧本）-based movies have exceeded those for book-based movies is insufficient（不足的，不够的） evidence to conclude(show, prove, illustrate（举例说明）, demonstrate(证明，论证，示范)) that writing screenplays now provides greater financial opportunity for writers.A这个事实（概念）并不足以证明B这个事实（概念）2.? ? ? ? It is possible that fees paid by movie studios for screenplays will decrease in the future relative to those for book rights.3.? ? ? ? The argument fails to rule out(划去，排除，取消) the possibility that a writer engages in（参加，使从事于）both types of writing as well as other writer.这个论述并没有排除。。。的可能性4．In any event(无论如何), the advertisement provides no justification(理由) for the mutually（互相地，互助）exclusive（排外的，独占的，唯一的）choice that it imposes on（利用，欺骗，施加影响于）the writer.5． The argument simply equates(treat) success with(as the indication of) movie ticket sales, which is unwarranted（无根据的，无保证的）.作者简单的把A和B划上了等号（简单的把A等同于B）6． The author assumes (make assumption) that physical capabilities are the only attribute（品质，特征，属性） necessary to operate a motor vehicle.作者假定物理性能是对运转机动车所必须的唯一属性。7．Moreover(此外), the author provides no evidence that the realism（现实主义） of color photography（摄影，摄影术） is the reason for its predominance（优势）.? ?此外，作者没能提供证据证明A就是B的原因。8．This assumption presents（提出，呈现，介绍） a false dilemma(进退两难的局面，困难的选择), since the two media are not necessarily mutually exclusive（互斥的） alternatives（事物，二中择一，可供选择的办法）.9．Common sense（常识） tells us that a photographer can succeed by working in both media. ? ?常识告诉我们。。。（不理性的，最好不用）10．The argument ignores the factors—such as initiative（主动）, creativity（创造，创造力）, technical skills, and business judgment（判断）—that may be more important than the choice of medium（媒体） in determining success in photograph.11. The major problem with the argument is that the stated（定期的，一定的）similarities（类似，类似处）between Company A and B are insufficient to support the conclusion that Company A will suffer（遭受，经历，忍受）