网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

新闻话语对读者的影响外文翻译.docxVIP

  1. 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
News Discourse and Its Influence on Readers Kumiko Murata This paper investigates the ways in which readers interpret a news editorial on the basis of cultural assumptions formulated partly under the influence of the media they are associated with.The result shows that in the case of the English version, the majority of the non-Japanese respondents were anti-whaling, while most of the Japanese version respondents (Japanese) were either neutral or pro-whaling. The English respondents overwhelmingly supported the editor’s anti-whaling stance despite pointing out the excessive use of emotive language. By contrast, most of the Japanese respondents showed strong disagreement with the editor’s attitude, pointing out the lack of evidence and information. Although the result does not necessarily show that this single editorial had a direct influence on the respondents, there are nonetheless some indications of the ways in which na?ve readers could be influenced by the media. Finally, the paper discusses implications of this study for language pedagogy. This paper is an attempt to investigate the relationship between readers’ cultural assumptions, beliefs and values and their interpretation and perception of news discourse, focusing specifically on the British press. News discourse has been extensively studied in the past by commentators, for example, from the perspective of media and sociolinguistics (Bell, 1991; Bell Garrett, 1998), of critical linguistics (Fowler, 1991; Fowler, Hodge, Kress Trew, 1979; Hodge Kress, 1993; Simpson, 1993; Trew, 1979), of critical linguistics and social theory (Fairclough, 1989, 1992, 1995a, 1995b, 1998, 2000), and of social cognition (van Dijk, 1988, 1993, 1996, 1998). Their approach, however, is not free from limitations, and it has been critically scrutinized mainly for the inadequacy of the linguistic analysis. In particular, there has been strong criticism of the analysis of limited lexical items and grammatical features, which are se

文档评论(0)

peace0308 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档