诉讼驳回诉讼请求判决研究——完稿.docVIP

行政诉讼驳回诉讼请求判决研究 摘要：行政诉讼判决，是行政诉讼最重要的结案方式，是人民法院对行政案件中实体问题所作的处理。1989年我国颁布的《行政诉讼法》确定了维持、撤销、履行和变更四种判决形式，初步建立了我国的行政判决制度。2000年最高人民法院在《关于执行中华人民共和国行政诉讼法若干问题的解释》中新增了驳回诉讼请求判决和确认判决两种判决形式，补充和发展了我国的行政诉讼判决制度。驳回诉讼请求判决与维持判决是人民法院审结行政案件使用较多的判决形式，理论界和实务界对这两种判决形式的具体适用存在争议。本文通过对行政诉讼驳回诉讼请求判决适用的实证分析和理论研究，分析驳回诉讼请求判决在具体适用中存在的问题和缺陷，得出驳回诉讼请求判决符合司法的本质属性和诉讼法原理，且不违背行政诉讼合法性审查原则的观点，并对取消现有的维持与确认合法有效判决，在《行政诉讼法》修改时明确规定驳回诉讼请求判决，并扩大和明确其适用范围提出自己的建议。 关键词：行政诉讼；驳回诉讼请求判决；维持判决；确认有效判决 Abstract: Judgment of administrative litigation,administrative litigation is the most important way is the case, peoples court for administrative cases in physical problems made by processing. In 1989, China promulgated the administrative procedure law identifies the maintenance, revocation, performance and modification of four kinds of sentence form, the initial establishment of Chinese administrative judgment system. In 2000 the Supreme Peoples Court on the implementation of the peoples Republic of China Administrative Procedure Law Interpretation on some issues concerning added rejected petition judgment and confirmation of two forms of judgments, supplement and development of Chinas administrative litigation judgement system. Rejected petition judgment and maintenance decision is the peoples Court concluded the administrative cases to use more judgment form, theory and practice of the two kinds of sentence form the specific application of the controversial. Based on the administrative lawsuit rejected petition judgment applies the empirical analysis and theoretical research, analysis of rejected petition judgment in the specific application of the existing problems and defects, it rejected petition judgment with the judicial nature and procedure law principle, and does not violate the principle of legality of administrative litigation, and to abolish the existing maintain and confirm the valid judgment, in the administrative procedure law amendment explicitly rejected petition judgment, and expand its scope of application and