无意思联络的数人侵权行为分析-analysis of infringement by several people who have no intention to contact with each other.docxVIP

下载本文档

2
0
约4.94万字
约 52页
2018-06-03 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

无意思联络的数人侵权行为分析-analysis of infringement by several people who have no intention to contact with each other.docx

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

无意思联络的数人侵权行为分析-analysis of infringement by several people who have no intention to contact with each other

本文第五部分分述了国外立法关于无意思联络的数人侵权行为的相关规定以及评价，无论是大陆法系还是英美法系，关于无意思联络的数人侵权行为的法律调整各有特色，也存在着一些弊病。本文第六部分梳理了我国关于无意思联络的数人侵权的立法现状，并提出了自己的完善意见。从《民法通则》到《关于审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干意见》中关于无意思联络的数人侵权行为的相关规定入手，指出了我国相关法律文件中对此种侵权行为法律规制的不足。在相关法律文件中，无意思联络的数人侵权的概念不明确、调整范围狭窄以及责任承担方式不合理都是有待改进的地方。在侵权行为法即将粉墨登场的今天，完善无意思联络的数人侵权行为的法律规范，对于侵权行为法更好地平衡行为自由和权利保护具有重大意义。关键词：无意思联络共同过错数人侵权共同侵权连带责任自己责任原则体系性价值AbstractWith the acceleration of tort law legislation process, discussion about related torts theory is intensified. In the multiple persons’ tort system, theoretical research of multiple persons’ tort with no contributory intention or negligence connects with the clarification of joint torts theory. Based upon strengthening protection of the injured, traditional joint torts theory persisted in subjective common theory and tends to objective common theory under the industrialization process, social and economic advancement. Article three of the Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court of Some Issues concerning the Application of Law for the Trial of Cases on Compensation for Personal Injury in 2003 stipulates that two persons or more commit torts with joint intention of negligence or exercise torts with no intention or negligence leading to the same injury under the direct combination of the acts constituting joint torts thereby tortfeasors shall assume joint and several liability in line with the Article 130 of General Principles of Civil Law; two persons or more exercises torts with no common intention or negligence causing sane damages under the indirect combination of separate acts thereby tortfeasors shall assume related compensation liability in accordance to the extent of negligence of proportion of causation. This judicial interpretation converted the traditional subjective common theory to subjective common theory and restricted objective common theory in substance. It is a breakthrough in certain degree that application extent of joint and several liabilities is enlarged and protection of the