刑事庭前会议制度实施问题分析-analysis of problems in the implementation of the pre-trial meeting system for criminal cases.docxVIP

刑事庭前会议制度实施问题分析-analysis of problems in the implementation of the pre-trial meeting system for criminal cases.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
刑事庭前会议制度实施问题分析-analysis of problems in the implementation of the pre-trial meeting system for criminal cases

要增加 RADVISION MCU 视频会议交互平台在庭前会议中的应用,以打破被告人参与庭前会议空间距离的禁锢,降低安全风险和诉讼成本。除了刑事诉讼法及司法解释 规定的 8 种事项外,庭前会议应增加证据开示作为首要环节。根据庭前会议解决事项的 不同,各事项具有不同的处理方式:关于程序性争议作出的裁决应当在庭审中或者裁判 文书中进行说明,除非有新的事实或证据,按照一事不再理的原则,不得再次提出申请 或者异议;非法证据排除问题,在了解双方意见的基础上置于庭审中解决;控辩双方对 案件事实和证据的争议焦点,庭前会议可以笔录的形式进行记录,没有争议的证据,庭 审时适当简化举证、质证程序;对于附带民事诉讼调解部分,若能达成调解协议,应及 时制作调解书,无法达成协议的,可将双方的争议点记入笔录,作为庭审中调解的依据。 其次,要发挥法官培训制度对提高法官司法技能水平、增强人权保障意识等方面的积极 作用。再次,通过告知义务的强化,保障被告人的知情权及其他诉讼权利。最后,建立 庭前会议制度的监督机制,在庭审中适当公开庭前会议达成的共识,既保障公众的知情 权,又不影响公正审判。关键词:庭前会议;实证考察;适用效果;制度完善AbstractThe paper can be divided into 3 parts besides the introduction and conclusion, about 30 thousand words.The first section is that the empirical investigation of pretrial conference system. To take the different levels of four provinces, Municipalities directly under the central government, judicial practice courts in different regions for the study samples, and by means of the empirical data analysis, collection of normative documents, case studies, surveys, etc., the status of implementation of the pretrial conference system has been inspection. Firstly, the empirical present situation of the pretrial conference system. While the reported cases of pretrial conference system emerging like mushrooms after rain, the overall rate of the application of this system is also seems very low. With no special limitations on the scope, it is applied in part charges of the Criminal Law?s the third, fourth, fifth, sixth chapters and eight chapters. The judges who participated in the pretrial conferences have a tendentious evaluation of satisfactory about it. The pretrial conference?s function of improving efficiency, sorting out evidences, clearing the point of contention, disputing settlement procedures is basically achieved. Secondly, the operational program of pretrial conference. In practice, in addition to the similarity of start-up mode and ending methods, there is diverse practice in the other aspects of pretrial conference, such as the host, participants, held in re

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档