- 1、本文档被系统程序自动判定探测到侵权嫌疑,本站暂时做下架处理。
- 2、如果您确认为侵权,可联系本站左侧在线QQ客服请求删除。我们会保证在24小时内做出处理,应急电话:400-050-0827。
- 3、此文档由网友上传,因疑似侵权的原因,本站不提供该文档下载,只提供部分内容试读。如果您是出版社/作者,看到后可认领文档,您也可以联系本站进行批量认领。
查看更多
[欧盟口译训练A2,英语].EUIT-EN-10101413
1
策马翻译培训
Euit
EU interpretation training
欧盟口译训练
Copyright © 2010 CEMACHINA.COM, All Rights Reserved
EU interpretation training | A
zh-en
2
策马翻译培训
美国是否走向财政大灾难?
THE RISING GOVERNMENT
BOND RATES PROVE POLICY
IS WORKING
Is the US (and a number of other 美国(和其它许多高收入国家)是否走
high-income countries) on the road to 在财政大灾难的路上?近期政府债券收益率
fiscal armageddon? Are recent jumps in 上扬是否验证了投资者对财政前景的担忧?
government bond rates proof that 我给这些问题的答案是:除了否定,还是否
investors are worried about fiscal 定。这并不意味着不存在担忧的理由。毋宁
prospects? My answers to these 说,目前存在反对财政紧缩的有力论据,以
questions are: No and No. This does not 及欢迎近期债券市场动向的强劲理由。
mean there is no reason for worry. It
is rather that there are powerful
arguments against fiscal retrenchment
right now and strong reasons for
welcoming recent moves in the bond
markets.
Last week, the Financial Times 上周,英国《金融时报》(FT)开辟两个
carried two columns arguing that the US 专栏,声称美国财政措施不可持续,一篇由
fiscal path was unsustainable, one by 斯坦福大学的约翰·泰勒(John Taylor)撰
Stanford Universitys John Taylor and 稿,另一篇由哈佛历史学家尼尔·弗格森
the other by the Harvard historian (Niall Ferguson)执笔。后者是对四月底一
Niall Ferguson. The latter, in turn, 场与他人论战的评论,论战对方是美国《纽
was a comment on a debate with, among 约时报》(New York Times)的专栏作家、诺
others, the New York Times columnist 贝尔奖得主保罗·克鲁格曼(Paul Krugman)。
and Nobel laureate Paul Krugman at the
end of April.
EU interpretation training | A
zh-en
3
策马翻译培训
On one point all serious analysts 严肃的分析人士在一个问题上是有共识
agree: public debt cannot rise, 的:相对于国内生产总值,公共债券不可无
relative to gross domestic product,
原创力文档


文档评论(0)