胺碘酮用于冠心病慢性心力衰竭合并室性心律失常的治疗效果[权威资料].docVIP

胺碘酮用于冠心病慢性心力衰竭合并室性心律失常的治疗效果[权威资料].doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
胺碘酮用于冠心病慢性心力衰竭合并室性心律失常的治疗效果[权威资料].doc

胺碘酮用于冠心病慢性心力衰竭合并室性心律失常的治疗效果   [摘要] 目的 探讨胺碘酮用于冠心病慢性心力衰竭合并室性心律失常的治疗效果。 方法 以我院收治的108例冠心病慢性心理衰竭合并室性心律失常患者为研究对象,随机分成两组,对照组(54例)采取常规治疗,观察组(54例)常规治疗基础上加用胺碘酮治疗,比较两组的治疗效果,记录治疗期间不良反应。 结果 观察组心率、左室射血分数、室性早搏总数和QT离散度改善效果明显好于对照组;观察组心功能改善有效率83.33%,心律控制有效率88.89%,对照组心功能改善有效率59.26%,心律控制有效率64.81%,组间疗效比较差异显著;两组治疗期间未见死亡病例,对照组治疗期间不良反应发生率9.26%,观察组不良反应发生率22.22%,组间比较无显著差异。 结论 胺碘酮提高冠心病慢性心衰合并室性心律失常的治疗效果,可进一步推广应用。   [关键词] 胺碘酮;冠心病慢性心力衰竭;室性心律失常;治疗效果   [] R541 [] B [] 2095-0616(2015)20-28-04   Treatment effect of amiodarone for chronic heart failure of coronary heart disease with ventricular arrhythmia   CHEN Dejun LIN Yuetao   Department of Respiratory,Huaqiao Hospital of Puning,Puning 515300,China   [Abstract] Objective To investigate the effect of amiodarone for chronic heart failure of coronary heart disease with ventricular arrhythmia. Methods 108 cases patients with chronic heart failure of coronary heart disease with ventricular arrhythmia in our hospital were regarded as the research object.They were randomly divided into 2 groups. Control group (54 cases) was treated by conventional treatment. Observation group (54 cases) was treated by amiodarone on the basis of conventional treatment.The therapeutic effect was compared,and adverse reaction was recorded during treatment. Results Heart rate,left ventricular ejection fraction,ventricular total and QT dispersion improvement of the observation group were significantly better than the control group.Heart function improvement rate of the observation group was 83.33%,and rhythm control rate was 88.89%.Heart function improvement rate of the control group was 59.26%,and rhythm control rate was 64.81%.The effect between groups had significantly difference.There was no death in the 2 groups during the treatment.Adverse reaction incidence of the control group was 9.26% during treatment.The adverse reaction incidence of the observation group was 22.22%.There was no significant difference between groups. Conclusion Amio

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

zhangningclb + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档