- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Focus Groups Peter D Mulcahy焦点小组彼得D玛尔卡茜
A seminar on Focus Groups Peter D. Mulcahy Manager of Institute Operations Institute for Survey Research November 17, 2006 Deciding to use Focus Groups Will focus groups serve your purposes? What are the strengths and weaknesses of focus groups? Common uses for focus groups. Do you have the resources you need? Will Focus Groups Serve Your Purposes? Focus groups are a qualitative research method that relies on group discussion and group dynamics to generate data on a topic or topics chosen by the researcher. (This definition is intentionally broad and includes most forms of group interviewing.) Some qualitative techniques are mistakenly called “focus groups.” Focus groups are a means of data collection. Techniques such as support groups or committee meetings, are therefore not focus groups. Focus groups emphasize group interaction. Techniques such as public forums or individual responses, are therefore not focus groups. In a true focus group… …it is YOUR focus. This is a RESEARCHER- constructed forum for gathering data. …but it is THEIR group. It is the participants’ discussions that generate the data. Strengths and Weaknesses of Focus Groups Focus groups have advantages and disadvantages when compared with other data collection techniques. Strengths: Group discussions help the researcher understand not just what people think, but also how and why they think the way they do. Interaction reveals participants’ experiences, feelings and ideas. Interaction also shows the extent and sources of consensus and diversity. Strengths (cont.): Groups create a more natural interaction by allowing participants to play a role in generating the data. Groups are also more flexible due to the open-ended format that allows you to respond to emerging data. Weaknesses: Focus groups lack the representativeness of surveys because of the small purposeful samples. Focus groups lack the conclusiveness of experiments because of the open-ended procedu
您可能关注的文档
- Dynamic Object Request动态对象请求.ppt
- Dynamic Object Sampling for Pretenuring - IBM Research动态对象采样pretenuring - IBM的研究.ppt
- Dynamic Objects动态对象.ppt
- Dynamic Social Knowledge A Comparative Evaluation动态的社会知识的比较评价.ppt
- Dynamic Scheduling - Abandah动态调度abandah.ppt
- DYNAMIC ORGANIZATIONAL FIT AND PROCESS OF 动态的组织配合和过程.ppt
- DYNAMIC MODEL - ENCON动态模型的填充.ppt
- Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks动态源路由在ad hoc无线网络.ppt
- Dynamic SLAs动态服务水平协议.ppt
- Dynamic SLA Negotiation in BREIN在BREIN动态SLA谈判.ppt
- Focus on Emergency and Disaster Nursing在紧急情况和灾难护理重点.ppt
- Focus Groups for the Health Workforce Retention Study焦点小组的健康员工保持研究.ppt
- Focus on feedback注重反馈.ppt
- Focus On Fractions - Test Server聚焦分数测试服务器.ppt
- Focus on Teams - Part 1 - Cal State LA - Instructional Web Server1部分:对团队的加州州立大学洛杉矶-教学Web服务器集中.ppt
- Focus On Teams - Part 22部分重点对团队.ppt
- Food Safety - Home Drexel University卓克索大学食品安全回家.ppt
- Focus on Pedagogy - Learning and Skills Observatory for Wales在教育学的学习和技能天文台威尔士焦点.ppt
- Focus on the Surgical and Elderly Patients集中在外科老年患者.ppt
- Food Safety - The University of Sydney食品安全-悉尼大学.ppt
原创力文档


文档评论(0)