- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Focus Groups - Title Welcome to lorraine-pinfo焦点小组标题欢迎洛林pinfo
[DTLLS] Advantages: More sociable than a one-to-one interview Raises unexpected issues for exploration Low cost, can get results relatively quickly Increases the sample size by talking with several people at once [Source: /wiki/Focus_group] Disadvantages: Less control than one-on-one interview Time can be lost on irrelevant issues Tough to analyse – talking is in reaction to other group member comments Groups are variable and may be difficult to assemble May be too few members for a representative sample [Source: /wiki/Focus_group] Preparation: Ice breaker 1 question Structure 2 Process 2 Outcome 3 Our Focus Group: Sample: 2 (male)? Setting: quiet classroom Duration: 15 mins (approx.)? Prepared questions: 8 Recording method: notes debrief Notes to include: body language Results: Structure (a): Is pace of topics ok? Variety can help, focus is appreciated Discussion fosters inclusivity Different ideas from different people Structure (b): Topics build progressively? Not taken up by group Process (a): Preferred delivery medium? Mixture is important Prefer Powerpoint to be limited An interesting aside about ppt v ohp Process (b): Medium least liked? In moderation, all ok Results: Results: Outcome (a): Does DTLLS inform your TP? Affirming, boosting confidence Professionally, vocabulary is important Enables discussion of concepts Outcome (b): Do essays clarify consolidate? Yes, more conscious of lesson design Results: Outcome (c): Is essay word limit ok? Encourages focus on topic Boundary/guidance appreciated Although restrictive, does stop waffle Results: Body Language Observation Normally video-recorded Analysed carefully We used hand-written notes debrief Very relaxed (familiar participants)? Deferential, consultative, amiable Consistent throughout Micro Conclusions: High degree of satisfaction Varied delivery is valued Social aspect is valued Topic progression may be undervalued The Overall Experience: Even a sma
您可能关注的文档
- Dynamic Modeling - II动态模型- II.ppt
- Dynamic Modeling with Java与Java的动态建模.ppt
- Dynamic Object Request动态对象请求.ppt
- Dynamic Object Sampling for Pretenuring - IBM Research动态对象采样pretenuring - IBM的研究.ppt
- Dynamic Objects动态对象.ppt
- Dynamic Social Knowledge A Comparative Evaluation动态的社会知识的比较评价.ppt
- Dynamic Scheduling - Abandah动态调度abandah.ppt
- DYNAMIC ORGANIZATIONAL FIT AND PROCESS OF 动态的组织配合和过程.ppt
- DYNAMIC MODEL - ENCON动态模型的填充.ppt
- Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks动态源路由在ad hoc无线网络.ppt
- FOCUS GROUPS - University of California, Berkeley焦点小组-加利福尼亚大学,伯克利.ppt
- Focus Groups Peter D Mulcahy焦点小组彼得D玛尔卡茜.ppt
- Focus on Emergency and Disaster Nursing在紧急情况和灾难护理重点.ppt
- Focus Groups for the Health Workforce Retention Study焦点小组的健康员工保持研究.ppt
- Focus on feedback注重反馈.ppt
- Focus On Fractions - Test Server聚焦分数测试服务器.ppt
- Focus on Teams - Part 1 - Cal State LA - Instructional Web Server1部分:对团队的加州州立大学洛杉矶-教学Web服务器集中.ppt
- Focus On Teams - Part 22部分重点对团队.ppt
- Food Safety - Home Drexel University卓克索大学食品安全回家.ppt
- Focus on Pedagogy - Learning and Skills Observatory for Wales在教育学的学习和技能天文台威尔士焦点.ppt
原创力文档


文档评论(0)