LEEP刀与聚焦超声对宫颈糜烂治疗效果对比研究.docVIP

LEEP刀与聚焦超声对宫颈糜烂治疗效果对比研究 　　【摘要】 目的：探讨宫颈糜烂采取LEEP刀与聚焦超声治疗的效果。方法：按照随机数字法将本院2014年1月-2015年9月接诊的宫颈糜烂患者120例分为两组，每组各60例，对照组采取LEEP刀治疗，研究组采取聚焦超声治疗（重庆海扶治疗仪）。观察记录两组患者的临床效果，以及手术时间、手术出血量和术后阴道流液时间，并进行对比分析。结果：研究组整体总有效率为96.67%，对照组则为90.00%，组间比较差异无统计学意义（P0.05）；但在治疗重度糜烂患者方面研究组总有效率明显高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P0.05）。研究组手术时间、手术出血量及术后阴道流液时间均明显低于对照组，组间比较差异均有统计学意义（P0.05）。结论：采取聚焦超声治疗宫颈糜烂，相比LEEP刀治疗而言手术出血量更少、术后排液时间更短，而且聚焦超声治疗属于无创技术，对于适合生育与有生育要求的女性患者十分适用，值得基层推广。 　　【关键词】 宫颈糜烂； LEEP刀； 聚焦超声； 效果 　　【Abstract】 Objective：To investigate the effect of LEEP knife and focused ultrasound treatment of cervical erosion.Method：One hundred and twenty patients with cervical erosion admitted to our hospital from January 2014 to June 2015 were divided into two groups according to random number table，60 patients in each group，LEEP knife treatment were adopted in the control group，while the study group was given focused ultrasound treatment（Hai-Fu focused ultrasound therapeutic apparatus）.The clinical effect of the two groups were observed，and the operation time，bleeding volume，postoperative vaginal fluid time were comparative analyzed.Result：The total effective rate of the study group was 96.67%，while which of the control group was 90.00%，the difference had no statistic significant（P0.05）.However，referring to the patients with severe cervical erosion，the total effective rate of the study group was obviously higher than which of the control group，the difference was statistic significant（P0.05）.The operation time，bleeding volume and postoperative vaginal fluid time were significantly lower in the study group than in the control group， the differences were statistically significant（P0.05）.Conclusion：The amount of bleeding and postoperative drainage time in the treatment of cervical erosion by microwave（focused ultrasound） are less than by the LEEP knife，and it belongs to non-invasive technology，for fertility and fertility requirements female patients，it is very suitable and worthy of promoting. 　　【Key words】 Cervical erosion