不同时间口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散在小儿肠镜检查前肠道准备中应用对比.docVIP

不同时间口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散在小儿肠镜检查前肠道准备中应用对比.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
不同时间口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散在小儿肠镜检查前肠道准备中应用对比

不同时间口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散在小儿肠镜检查前肠道准备中的应用对比   【摘要】 目的:探讨不同时间口服复方聚乙二醇(PEG)电解质散在小儿肠镜检查前肠道准备中的应用效果。方法:选取2014年1月-2015年8月于本院门诊做肠镜检查的患儿84例,按照随机数字表法分为试验组与对照组,各42例。试验组和对照组患儿分别于手术前一晚睡觉前(术前12 h)和手术当日清晨(术前6 h)口服复方PEG电解质散进行肠道准备。比较两组肠道准备量表(BBPS)评分、依从性和不良反应。结果:两组BBPS总评分比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05);试验组依从性良好率为95.24%,明显高于对照组的80.95%,比较差异有统计学意义( 字2=4.086,P=0.043);?验组不良反应发生率为4.76%(2/42),低于对照组的7.14%(3/42),但比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:肠镜检查患儿于术前12 h服用复方PEG电解质散行肠道准备可以提高患儿的依从性,更容易被患儿和家长接受,是比较合理的肠道准备方法。   【关键词】 肠镜检查; 复方聚乙二醇电解质散; 肠道准备   Comparison of the Application of Different Oral Time Schemes for Compound Polyethylene Glycol Electrolytes Powder in Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation in Children/LIU Qiuju,LIU Yanqing,KUANG Yunsha.//Medical Innovation of China,2018,15(06):043-046   【Abstract】 Objective:To investigate the effect of different oral time schemes for compound polyethylene glycol(PEG) electrolytes powder in colonoscopy bowel preparation in children.Method:A total of 84 children with enteroscopy from January 2014 to August 2015 in our hospital were selected,according to the random number table method,they were divided into experimental group and control group,42 cases in each group.The experimental group and control group were given compound PEG electrolyte powder before bedtime(12 hours before operation) and early morning(6 hours before operation) before operation for intestinal preparation.The scores of Boston bowel preparation scale(BBPS),compliance and adverse reactions between two groups were compared.Result: The total score of BBPS in two groups was compared,the difference was not statistically significant(P0.05).The good compliance rate of experimental group was 95.24%,which was significantly higher than 80.95% of control group,the difference was statistically significant( 字2=4.086,P=0.043).The incidence of adverse reactions in experimental group was 4.76% (2/42),which was lower than 7.14%(3/42) of control group,but the difference was not statistically significant(P0.05).Conclusion:Intestinal preparat

文档评论(0)

fangsheke66 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档