- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
上海某社区老年人骨质疏松症群组管理效果评价
上海某社区老年人骨质疏松症的群组管理效果评价
摘 要 目的:?u价上海某社区骨质疏松症的群组干预管理1年的效果。方法:按照随机对照试验研究设计,将120例骨质疏松患者随机分组,干预组60例,男性15例,女性45例,平均年龄(69.25±4.88)岁;对照组60名,男性14例,女性46例,平均年龄(68.98±4.90)岁。对照组实施常规药物治疗模式,干预组在对照组的基础上接受骨质疏松症群组干预管理模式,比较干预前后生活质量(QUALEFFO-41)和骨密度的变化。结果:1年群组干预后,干预组中疼痛、身体技能、社交活动能力、总体身体感觉、心理精神功能等生活质量评分与总评分均有明显的下降,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。干预后干预组的生活质量评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.001),干预组的骨密度平均水平高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.001)。结论:社区骨质疏松群组管理模式可改善患者的生活质量和骨密度水平。
关键词 骨质疏松;群组干预;骨密度;效果
中图分类号:R681 文献标志码:A 文章编号:1006-1533(2018)10-0035-03
Evaluation of the effect of group management on osteoporosis in the elderly people in a community of Shanghai
SONG Yu, XU Guangzheng
(General Practice Clinic of Xujiahui Community Health Service Center of Xuhui District, Shanghai 200030, China)
ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the effect of group intervention management on osteoporosis in a community of Shanghai for 1 year. Methods: According to the randomized controlled trial design, 120 patients with osteoporosis were randomly divided into two groups, there were 60 cases in an intervention group with 15 male and 45 female, and the average age was(69.25±4.88) years. In a control group, there were 60 cases with 14 males, and 46 females, and the average age was (68.98±4.90) years. The control group implemented conventional drug treatment mode, and on the basis of the control group, the intervention group received the osteoporosis group intervention management mode. The changes of quality of life(QUALEFFO-41) and bone density were compared before and after intervention. Results: After 1 year of group intervention, the life quality scores and total scores of pain, physical skills, social activity ability, general physical sensation, and psychological and mental function of the intervention group were significantly decreased, and the difference was statistically significant(P0.05). After intervention, the quality of life score of the intervention group was lower than that of the control group, and the difference was stati
原创力文档


文档评论(0)