- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
中医针灸治疗糖尿病周围神经病变患者疗效观察
中医针灸治疗糖尿病周围神经病变患者的疗效观察
[摘要] 目的 分析中医针灸治疗糖尿病周围神经病变的治疗效果。 方法 选取 2014年7月― 2015年10月该院收治的80例糖尿病周围神经病患者,随机分为观察组(n=40)和对照组(n=40),对照组实施常规治疗,观察组在对照组的基础上实施针灸,比较两组患者的临床疗效和治疗前后神经体征情况。 结果 观察组患者中,8例患者治愈,19例患者有效,11例患者显效,2例患者无效,总有效率为 95.0% ;对照组治愈、有效、显效、无效例数分别为5例、14例、13例、 8例,总有效率为 80.0% ,两组对比差异有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗后观察组患者神经体征为(5.53±0.12),优于对照组(6.35±0.19),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05 )。结论 对于糖尿病周围神经病变患者,采用中医针灸治疗临床疗效更优,改善患者神经症状,提高患者的生存治疗,值得临床推广使用。
[关键词] 针灸治疗;糖尿病;周围神经病变
[中图分类号] R587.1 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1672-4062(2017)05(a)-0174-02
Observation of Curative Effect of Acupuncture of TCM on Patients with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
SHAO Zhong-jun
Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Physiotherapy, the 465 Affiliated Hospital of Jilin Medical College, Jilin, Jilin Province, 132013 China
[Abstract] Objective This paper tries to analyze the curative effect of acupuncture and moxibustion on patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Methods 80 cases of patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy from July 2014 to October 2015 in the hospital were selected and randomly divided into the observation group and the control group, with 40 cases in each. The control group adopted routine treatment, the observation group adopted acupuncture as well as the routine treatment, and the clinical curative effect and neurological signs of both groups were compared. Results 8 cases were cured, 19 cases were effective, 11 cases were markedly effective, 2 cases were ineffective in the observation group and the total efficiency rate was 95.0%; 5 cases were cured, 14 cases were effective, 13 cases were markedly effective and 8 cases were ineffective in the control group and the total efficiency rate was 80.0%, so there was statistically significant difference between these two groups (P0.05); neurological signs of patients in the observation group after the treatment was (5.53±0.12), which were better than that of the control group (6.35±0.19), so there was significant difference between these two g
原创力文档


文档评论(0)