- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
两种新辅助化疗方案应用于进展期胃癌术前治疗中疗效研究
两种新辅助化疗方案应用于进展期胃癌术前治疗中的疗效研究
[摘要] 目的 比较两种新辅助化疗方案应用于进展期胃癌术前治疗中的疗效。 方法 选择2008年3月~2014年3月在我院普外科和肿瘤科进行治疗的将110例进展期胃癌患者,将其分为A、B、C三组,A、B组在手术治疗前分别采用XELOX和FOLFOX化疗方案,C组采取单纯手术治疗,比较临床疗效和不良反应。 结果 A组化疗后缓解率(69.0%)高于B组(67.6%),但差异无统计学意义(P0.05);A、B两组治疗后较治疗前肿瘤的平均体积显著缩小,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。B组在恶心呕吐、粒细胞减少、血小板减少、腹泻发生率方面均高于A组,在外周神经毒性发生率方面低于A组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 XELOX方案和FOLFOX 方案均可有效提高进展期胃癌患者的临床缓解率和手术根治性切除率,但前者不良反应更少,安全性更高,在临床应用中具有一定的优势。
[关键词] 进展期胃癌;新辅助化疗;XELOX;FOLFOX
[中图分类号] R735.2 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2016)06-0062-04
Research on the efficacy of two neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatments applied in the treatment advanced gastric cancer before operation
CAI Lingle
Department of General Surgery, Ninth Peoples Hospital of Zhengzhou City, Zhengzhou 450000, China
[Abstract] Objective To compare the efficacy of two neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatments applied in the treatment before advanced gastric cancer operation. Methods A total of 110 cases of advanced gastric cancer patients who received treatment in department of general surgery and department of oncology of our hospital from March 2008 to March 2014 were chosen and analyzed, and these patients were divided into group A, group B and group C. Patients in group A and group B received XELOX chemotherapy treatment and FOLFOX chemotherapy treatment before operation respectively, and patients in group C received simple surgical treatment. The clinical efficacy and adverse reactions were compared. Results The remission rate of group A (69.0%) was higher than that of group B (67.6%), but the difference was not statistically significant(P0.05). The average tumor volumes of group A and group B after treatment significantly reduced, compared with those before treatment, the difference was statistically significant(P0.05). The incidence rate of nausea and vomiting, neutropenia reduction, thrombocytopenia reduction, and the incidence rate of diarrhea in group B were higher than those in group A, and the outer peripheral neurotoxici
文档评论(0)