两种不同方法治疗慢性细菌性前列腺炎疗效对比.docVIP

两种不同方法治疗慢性细菌性前列腺炎的疗效对比 　　[摘要] 目的 探讨两种不同方法治疗慢性细菌性前列腺炎的疗效。方法 选取我院收治的70例慢性细菌性前列腺炎患者，随机分为两组：对照组35例，给予口服抗生素治疗；治疗组35例，给予口服中药、抗生素及坐浴等综合治疗。治疗6周后，比较两组患者症状评分及临床疗效。结果 两组治疗前后组内比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；两组治疗后差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。两组治疗总有效率分别为97.1%和71.4%，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 中西药联合中药坐浴治疗慢性细菌性前列腺炎的疗效较单纯使用抗生素更显著，能有效减轻症状，提高疗效。 　　[关键词] 慢性细菌性前列腺炎；中西药结合；坐浴；疗效观察 　　[中图分类号] R697.3#8195;#8195;#8195;[文献标识码] B#8195;#8195;#8195;[文章编号] 2095-0616（2014）09-112-03 　　 　　Comparison of clinical efficacy of two different methods for chronic bacterial prostatitis 　　CHEN#8195;Chenghu#8195;#8195;LIN#8195;Lihong#8195;#8195;ZHENG#8195;Haidong#8195;#8195;TANG#8195;Jianru 　　Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xiuyu Hospital in Putian City, Putian 351146, China 　　[Abstract] Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of two different methods for chronic bacterial prostatitis. Methods 70 patients were randomly divided into treatment group(35 patients) and control group(35 patients). The control group only took antibiotics, while treatment group took treatment of western medicine, internal medicine and sitting bath. Symptom scores and clinical efficacy were observed. Restults It was statistically significant different for each group and between the two groups after the treatment(P＜0.05). The total effective rate of two groups were 97.1% and 71.4%, so it was significant different(P＜0.05). Conclusion The method of combine western medicine, internal medicine and sitting bath for chronic bacterial prostatitis is better than the other one and it can relieve symptoms and increase clinical efficacy. 　　[Key words] Chronic bacterial prostatitis;Combination of Chinese and Western medicine;Sitting bath;Efficacy observation 　　慢性细菌性前列腺炎是一种较为常见的由一种或多种细菌引起的慢性感染性疾病。临床表现主要是尿频、尿急、尿痛、夜尿增多及腰骶部不适或疼痛等。致病菌主要是革兰氏阴性需氧菌，包括大肠杆菌及铜绿假单胞菌，也有部分革兰氏阳性菌也可能成为其致病菌。目前还有部分病因不明，因此单用抗生素治疗效果常不佳[1-3]。本文主要在探讨中西药联合坐浴治疗的疗效，取得了较为满意的效果，现报道如下。 　　 　　1#8195;资料与方法 　　1.1#8195;一般资料 　　将我院从2011年8月～2013年12月收治的70例慢性细菌性前列腺炎患者随机分为两组：对照组35例，平均年龄（30.1±4.7）岁，平均病程