临床护理路径在糖尿病周围神经病变患者中应用效果分析.docVIP

临床护理路径在糖尿病周围神经病变患者中的应用效果分析 　　[摘要] 目的 分析临床护理路径在糖尿病周围神经病变患者中的应用效果。 方法 选择该院收治的90例糖尿病周围神经病变患者作为临床研究对象，将采用临床护理路径的45例患者视为观察组，将采用常规护理的另外45例患者视为对照组，对比两组护理后的神经传导速度和疾病知识掌握度、住院时间、住院费用。结果 护理后，观察组的SCV和MCV正中神经、胫神经和腓总神经传导速度均优于对照组；疾病知识掌握度高于对照组，住院时间短于对照组，住院费用少于对照组，两组以上指标差异有统计学意义（P0.05）。结论 给予糖尿病周围神经病变患者临床护理路径能有效改善神经传导速度、提高疾病知识掌握度、缩短住院时间及减少住院费用，值得推广。 　　[关键词] 临床护理路径；糖尿病周围神经病变；神经传导速度 　　[中图分类号] R473 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1672-4062（2016）03（a）-0157-03 　　Application of Clinical Nursing Path Effect in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Patients in the Analysis 　　CHEN Yan-e，WANG Qian，JIAO Lin-lin，ZHAO Tian-tian 　　Shandong zibo city central hospital neurology，Zibo，Shandong Province， 255000 　　[Abstract] Objective Analysis of clinical nursing path effect in diabetic peripheral neuropathy patients in. Methods Select our hospital 90 cases of diabetic peripheral neuropathy were as a clinical study， the use of clinical nursing path 45 patients treated as the observation group， will use the routine care of an additional 45 patients were treated as the control group， compared to the two groups after treatment the nerve conduction velocity and the knowledge level of disease， hospital stay， hospital costs. Results After treatment， MCV and MCH observation group median nerve， tibial nerve and peroneal nerve conduction velocity than the control group； disease knowledge level of the control group， shorter hospital stay than the control group， the hospital costs than the control group， two above indexes between groups was statistically significant （P0.05）.Conclusion Giving diabetic peripheral neuropathy patients can improve clinical care path nerve conduction velocity， improve disease knowledge level degree， shorter hospital stays and reduce hospital costs， worthy of promotion. 　　[Key words] Clinical care path； Diabetic peripheral neuropathy； Nerve conduction velocity 　　糖尿病周围神经病变是糖尿病最为常见的一种慢性并发症，典型症状为麻木、腹胀、疼痛和出汗，严重者可随着病情的进一步发展出现足部顽固性溃疡，不仅会影响自身的日常生活和身心健康，还会加重家庭经济上的负担[1-2]。目前，临床上除了给予患者西医、中医等治疗外，护理同样是重点环节，理应予以