优质护理干预在慢性肾衰竭腹膜透析患者护理中应用分析.docVIP

优质护理干预在慢性肾衰竭腹膜透析患者护理中应用分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
优质护理干预在慢性肾衰竭腹膜透析患者护理中应用分析

优质护理干预在慢性肾衰竭腹膜透析患者护理中的应用分析   [摘要]目的 探讨优质护理干预在慢性肾衰竭腹膜透析患者护理中的应用分析。方法 选取2015年6年~2016年8月于我院进行腹膜透析的86例慢性肾衰竭患者作为研究对象。运用简单随机法将其分为实验组及对照组,每组43例。实验组运用优质护理干预,对照组运用常规护理。比较两组患者的并发症发生情况、护理后营养状况改善情况及生活质量情况。结果 干预后,实验组的并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。干预后实验组患者的MIS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。干预后实验组患者的体质量指数(MIS)、血清白蛋白、血红蛋白均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。干预后实验组患者的生理功能、身体疼痛、总体健康、心理健康评分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 优质护理能够改善慢性肾衰患者腹膜透析患者的生活质量,降低其并发症发生率,提高营养状况。   [关键词]优质护理;慢性肾衰竭;透析;生活质量   [中图分类号] R692.5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2018)1(a)-0170-03   [Abstract]Objective To explore the application of high quality nursing intervention in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing peritoneal dialysis.Methods Altogether 86 patients with chronic renal failure undergoing peritoneal dialysis treated in our hospital from June 2015 to August 2016 were selected as the subjects,and divided into the experiment group and the control group by simple random method,with 43 cases in each group.The experiment group was treated with high quality nursing intervention,while the control group received routine nursing care.The incidence of complications,improvement of nutritional status and quality of life were compared between the two groups.Results After the intervention,the incidence of complications in the experiment group was lower than that in the control group,with statistically significant difference (P0.05).After the intervention,the Malnutrition-inflammation Scale (MIS) score of the experiment group was lower than that in the control group,with statistically significant difference (P0.05).After the intervention,the body mass index,serum albumin and hemoglobin of the experiment group were higher than those in the control group,with statistically significant difference (P0.05).After the intervention,the scores of physiological function,body pain,general health and mental health in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group,with statistically significant difference (P0.05).Conclusion High quali

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

erterye + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档