优质护理对肝硬化上消化道出血患者影响.docVIP

优质护理对肝硬化上消化道出血患者影响.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
优质护理对肝硬化上消化道出血患者影响

优质护理对肝硬化上消化道出血患者的影响   DOI:10.16662/j.cnki.1674-0742.2017.25.166   [摘要] 目的 探讨优质护理对肝硬化上消化道出血患者护理效果。方法 随机选取2014年1月―2016年12月内蒙古科技大学包头医学院第一附属医院消化科收治的60例肝硬化伴上消化道出血患者。随机将60例患者分为观察组和对照组,各30例。观察组给予优质护理干预,对照组给予常规护理干预,观察两组患者的止血时间、出血量、并发症、生活质量等情况。 结果 观察组患者的出血量(446.75±20.77)mL、对照组患者的出血量(680.86±35.68)mL,观察组的止血时间,差异有统计学意义(29.65±4.62)h、对照组(36.87±5.59)h,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)观察组患者的并发症及出血量发生率均低于对照组(P0.05),观察组患者的生活质量高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 采取优质护理干预能够明显改善肝硬化伴消化道出血患者的临床疗效,提高患者的生活质量,值得在临床上推广和使用。   [关键词] 优质护理干预;肝硬化;上消化道出血   [中图分类号] R47 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2017)09(a)-0166-03   Effect of High Quality Nursing on Patients with Liver Cirrhosis and Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage   ZHANG Li-rong, CAO Xia   Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Baotou, Inner Mongolia, 014000 China   [Abstract] Objective This paper tries to observe the effect of high quality nursing care in patients with liver cirrhosis and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Methods 60 patients with liver cirrhosis and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage admitted in this hospital from January 2014 to December 2016 were random selected and randomly divided into the observation group and the control group, with 30 cases in each group. The observation group adopted high quality nursing intervention, the control group adopted routine nursing intervention. Hemostasis time, amount of bleeding, complications and life quality of the two groups were compared. Results The blood loss in the observation group was(446.75±20.77)mL, and that in the control group was(680.86±35.68)mL, The hemostasis time of the observation group was(29.65±4.62)h, and the control group was (36.87±5.59)h, which was statistically significant(P0.05). The complication rate and the amount of bleeding in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and there was statistical significance (P0.05). The quality of life in the observation group was better than that in the control group, an

文档评论(0)

erterye + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档