依达拉奉联合奥扎格雷钠治疗急性脑梗死疗效及安全性探讨.docVIP

依达拉奉联合奥扎格雷钠治疗急性脑梗死疗效及安全性探讨.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
依达拉奉联合奥扎格雷钠治疗急性脑梗死疗效及安全性探讨

依达拉奉联合奥扎格雷钠治疗急性脑梗死的疗效及安全性探讨   [摘要] 目的 针对急性脑梗死病症,采用依达拉奉联合奥扎格雷钠进行治疗,探讨其疗效与安全性。方法 临床纳入急性脑梗死患者70例,根据治疗方法的不同分为研究组与对照组。研究组给予依达拉奉联合奥扎格雷钠,对照组仅给予奥扎格雷钠。对两组患者分别进行严密观察,查看治疗后的效果,即疗效,患者日常的生活能力指数评分和神经功能的缺损评分在治疗前后分别对其进行对比分析。此外,观察患者治疗期间发生的药物不良反应。结果 研究组治疗有效率为97.14%,对照组治疗有效率为82.86%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);研究组治疗后第2、4周神经功能缺损评分为(16.33±10.57)、(13.10±9.11),对照组为(21.20±13.20)、(18.60±10.21);研究组治疗后第2、4周日常生活能力指数评分为(50.20±15.22)、(66.03±16.11),对照组为(42.57±13.63)、(52.25±14.01),差异均有有统计学意义(P0.05);两组患者治疗期间均未出现药物不良反应。结论 依达拉奉联合奥扎格雷钠治疗急性脑梗死的疗效确切,能够短期内促进神经功能的恢复,且无明显的不良反应,值得推广。   [关键词] 依达拉奉;奥扎格雷钠;急性脑梗死;疗效;安全性   [中图分类号] R4 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2014)11(c)-0040-03   [Abstract] Objective To observe the effect and safety of edaravone combined with sodium ozagrel in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction. Methods 70 cases with acute cerebral infarction were enrolled clinically and divided into the study group and the control group according to different treatment methods. The study group was treated by edaravone combined with sodium ozagrel, and the control group was treated by sodium ozagrel. Two groups of patients were observed intensively for checking the treatment effect, namely, the efficacy. The activity of daily living and neurological deficit score of both groups were compared and analyzed before and after treatment. In addition, the adverse drug reactions occurred in both groups during the treatment were observed. Results The effective rate of the study group was 97.14%, and that of the control group was 82.86%, the difference was significant (P0.05); the neurological deficit score of the study group after 2 weeks and 4 weeks of treatment was (16.33±10.57) points, (13.10±9.11) points, respectively, and that of the control group was (21.20±13.20) points, (18.60±10.21) points, respectively; the score of activity of daily living of the study group after 2 weeks and 4 weeks of treatment was (50.20±15.22) points, (66.03±16.11) points, respectively, and that of the control group was (42.57±13.63) point

文档评论(0)

189****7685 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档