保温护理干预预防直肠癌根治术患者术中低体温研究.docVIP

保温护理干预预防直肠癌根治术患者术中低体温研究.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
保温护理干预预防直肠癌根治术患者术中低体温研究

保温护理干预预防直肠癌根治术患者术中低体温的研究   【摘要】 目的 分析研究保温护理干预预防直肠癌根治术患者术中低体温的价值。方法 78例进行直肠癌根治术的患者, 根据护理方法不同分为对照组与观察组, 每组39例。对照组患者术中予以常规护理干预模式, 观察组患者术中予以保温护理干预模式, 利用多功能体温检测仪对两组患者的体温进行实时测量, 准确记录两组患者术中30、60、90、120 min的体温数值, 并进行比较。结果 两组患者术中30 min的体温数值比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05);但观察组患者术中60、90、120 min的体温数值分别为(36.1±0.3)、(36.2±0.6)、(36.5±0.6)℃, 均明显高于同期对照组患者的(35.6±0.2)、(35.4±0.2)、(35.1±0.1)℃, 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 术中对于直肠癌根治术患者采取有效的保温护理干预能够有效保持患者的体温, 具有较高的临床推广价值。   【关键词】 保温护理干预;直肠癌;低体温   DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2018.04.074   Study of heat preservation nursing intervention in preveting intraoperative hypothermia of patients with rectal cancer radical surgery YANG Chan-ping, LI Liu-yang, WU Xiao-ling. Guangdong Shantou University Medical College Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Shantou 515031, China   【Abstract】 Objective To analyze the value of heat preservation nursing intervention in preveting intraoperative hypothermia of patients with rectal cancer radical surgery. Methods A total of 78 patients with rectal cancer radical surgery were divided by different nursing methods into control group and observation group, with 39 cases in each group. The control group received conventional nursing intervention, and the observation group received heat preservation nursing intervention. The body temperature of two groups was measured in real time by multi-function body temperature detector. The temperature values at 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after operation were accurately recorded and compared. Results Both groups had no statistically significant difference in body temperature of 30 min after operation (P0.05). The observation group had body temperature of 60, 90 and 120 min after operation respectively as (36.1±0.3), (36.2±0.6) and (36.5±0.6)℃, which were all   obviously higher than (35.6±0.2), (35.4±0.2) and (35.1±0.1)℃ in the control group of the same period, and their   difference was statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion Heat preservation nursing intervention can effectively maintain the pati

文档评论(0)

189****7685 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档