后腹腔镜配合输尿管硬镜对肾结石疗效观察.docVIP

后腹腔镜配合输尿管硬镜对肾结石疗效观察.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
后腹腔镜配合输尿管硬镜对肾结石疗效观察

后腹腔镜配合输尿管硬镜对肾结石疗效观察   [摘要] 目的 探讨俯卧位经腰背部入路后腹腔镜配合输尿管硬镜治疗肾结石的效果及优势。 方法 选取2011年12月~2013年12月入住本院治疗肾结石的患者102例,将其随机分成治疗组及对照1、2组,每组各34例。治疗组采用俯卧位经腰背部入路后腹腔镜配合输尿管硬镜法取石,对照1组采用经皮肾镜取石术取石,对照2组采用常规侧卧位后腹腔镜肾盂切开法取石,比较3组的术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、并发症及结石取尽率情况。 结果 治疗组的术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、并发症发生率、结石取尽率分别为(83.4±16.2)ml、(101.3±9.7)min、(6.5±1.4)d、2.94%、100%,治疗组的术中出血量少于对照1、2组,手术、住院时间均短于对照1、2组,并发症发生率低于对照1、2组,结石取尽率高于对照1、2组(P0.05)。 结论 后腹腔镜配合输尿管硬镜治疗肾结石具有术中出血量少,手术、住院用时短,并发症少以及取石彻底等优势,值得临床推广应用。   [关键词] 肾结石;后腹腔镜;输尿管硬镜   [中图分类号] R692.4 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1674-4721(2014)04(b)-0189-03   [Abstract] Objective To explore the effect and advantage of prone position retroperitoneoscopy by the approach of lumbar spinal cord combined with rigid ureteroscopy in the treatment of kidney stone. Methods 102 patients with kidney stone who were hospitalized and treated in our hospital from December 2011 to December 2013 were selected and randomly divided into the treatment group (n=34),the control group 1 (n=34) and the control group 2 (n=34).The treatment group received prone position retroperitoneoscopy by the approach of lumbar spinal cord combined with rigid ureteroscopy to remove the stones,the control group 1 received percutaneous nephrolithotripsy to remove the stones,the control group 2 received conventional lateral position retroperitoneoscopic pelvis incision to remove the stones,the intraoperative blood loss,surgical time,hospital stay,complications and depletion rate of stones of the three groups were compared. Results The intraoperative blood loss,surgical time,hospital stay,complications and depletion rate of stones of the treatment group was (83.4±16.2)ml,(101.3±9.7)min,(6.5±1.4)d,2.94%,100% respectively,intraoperative blood loss in the treatment group was fewer than that in the control group 1 and 2,surgical time,hospital stay of the treatment group was shorter than those in the control group 1 and 2,the incidence rate of complication in the treatment group was lower than that in the control group 1 and 2,depleti

文档评论(0)

fangsheke66 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档