围术期氧气雾化护理干预在老年患者全身麻醉腹部手术中应用.docVIP

围术期氧气雾化护理干预在老年患者全身麻醉腹部手术中应用 　　[摘要] 目的 探究在老年患者全身麻醉腹部手术的过程中，应用围术期氧气雾化护理干预的效果。方法 方便选取46例老年全身麻醉腹部手术患者进行围术期氧气雾化护理干预，并归为观察组，选取另外40例患者采用常规干预，并归为对照组，两组患者均为该院2013年2月―2016年5月间收治。 结果 针对性比较两组患者的咳嗽咳痰发生率发现，观察组患者30.43%明显较低（对照组为47.50%）；针对性比较两组患者的咳嗽咳痰轻重程度发现，观察组患者相对较轻，?^察组轻度所占比例为50.00%，对照组仅为26.31%；针对性比较两组患者的肺部感染发生率发现，观察组发生率23.91%相对较低（对照组为40.00%），组间比较差异有统计学意义（P0.05）。 结论 围术期氧气雾化护理干预在老年患者全身麻醉腹部手术中的应用发现，其能够帮助患者临床情况得到较好的改善，同时减少患者出现相应的不良事件，促进患者及时恢复，因此值得临床借鉴。 　　[关键词] 围术期；氧气雾化护理干预；老年患者；全身麻醉；腹部手术 　　[中图分类号] R5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742（2016）12（c）-0121-03 　　[Abstract] Objective To explore the effect of perioperative oxygen atomization nursing intervention in elderly patients undergoing abdominal operation during general anesthesia. Methods Convenient selection 46 cases of elderly patients with general anesthesia for abdominal surgery during the perioperative nursing intervention of oxygen atomization， and classified as the observation group， the other 40 cases were treated by routine intervention， and classified as the control group， two groups of patients were in our hospital from May 2016 to February 2013. Results The comparison of two groups of patients the incidence of cough and expectoration， 30.43% patients in the observation group were significantly lower （control group 47.50%）； the comparison of two groups of patients with cough severity， patients in the observation group were relatively mild， mild observation group accounted for 50.00%， only 26.31% of the control group； according to the comparison of two groups of patients with lung infection rate， the observation group was 23.91% lower （control group 40.00%）， the difference was statistically significant（P0.05）. Conclusion Perioperative nursing intervention inhalation general anesthesia in elderly patients with abdominal surgery in that it can help the patients get better， and reduce the adverse events of some patients， promote patients recover in time， so it is worthy of clinical reference. 　　[Key words] Perioperative period； O