妇科盆腔炎患者中不同用药应用研究.docVIP

妇科盆腔炎患者中不同用药应用研究 　　摘要：目的：探讨用中西医结合疗法治疗妇科盆腔炎的临床效果。方法：对2013年6月～2014年6月期间我院妇科收治的168例盆腔炎患者的临床资料进行回顾性研究。将168例患者随机分为对照组和观察组，每组各有84例患者。为对照组患者使用西医疗法进行治疗，为观察组患者使用中西医结合疗法进行治疗。治疗结束后，比较两组患者的治疗效果及其不良反应的发生率。结果：经过治疗，对照组患者治疗的总有效率为69.05%，观察组患者治疗的总有效率为88.10%。观察组患者治疗的总有效率明显高于对照组患者，二者相比差异具有显著性（X2=4.53，p=0.033）。对照组患者不良反应的发生率为11.9%，观察组患者不良反应的发生率为9.52%。观察组患者不良反应的发生率明显低于对照组患者，二者相比差异具有显著性（X2=0.12，p=0.72）。结论：用中西医结合疗法治疗妇科盆腔炎的效果显著，且安全性高。此疗法值得在临床推广使用。 　　关键词：盆腔炎；中西医结合治疗；临床疗效 　　Abstract：Objective： To explore with Chinese and Western medicine treatment of gynecological pelvic inflammatory clinical effects. Methods： June 2013 retrospective clinical study of 168 cases of pelvic inflammatory disease data I admitted during gynecological hospital in June 2014. 168 patients were randomly divided into control group and observation group， 84 patients in each group. The control group of patients treated using Western medicine， the use of Chinese and Western medicine for treatment of patients in the observation group. After treatment， the treatment effect and the two groups were compared the incidence of adverse reactions. Results： After treatment， patients treated with the control group， the total effective rate was 69.05% in the observation group total effective rate of patients treated with 88.10 percent. The total effective rate was significantly higher in patients with the treatment of patients in the observation group， the difference was significant compared to two （X2= 4.53， p = 0.033）. Adverse reactions in patients in the control group was 11.9%， the occurrence of adverse reactions in patients in the observation group was 9.52%. The incidence of adverse reactions in patients in the observation group was significantly lower than the control group of patients， the difference was significant compared to two （X2 = 0.12， p = 0.72）. Conclusion： The effect of using Chinese and Western medicine treatment of gynecological pelvic inflammatory disease is significant， and safe. This therapy is worth in clini