- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
治疗性沟通及干预对乳腺癌手术患者术后恢复心理应激及希望水平影响
治疗性沟通及干预对乳腺癌手术患者术后恢复心理应激及希望水平影响
[摘要] 目的 探?治疗性沟通及干预对乳腺癌手术患者术后恢复、心理应激及希望水平的影响。方法 收集2012年5月~2016年1月在自贡市第三人民医院接受手术治疗的90例乳腺癌患者,按照随机数表法分为观察组(n=45)和对照组(n=45)。对照组患者接受常规护理,观察组患者在常规护理基础上加入治疗性沟通干预。记录两组患者的术后卧床时间、切口引流时间、总住院时间,采用肩关节Neer评分评价术后肢体功能,采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评估两组患者的负面情绪,采用心理弹性量表(CD-RISC)评价患者的心理弹性;采用Herth希望量表(HHI)评估患者对于疾病康复的希望状态。 结果 观察组患者的术后卧床时间、切口引流时间、总住院时间均短于对照组(P 0.05)。术后1周,两组SAS、SDS评分值低于术前,CD-RISC、HHI评分值高于术前(P 0.05);且观察组SAS、SDS评分值低于对照组,CD-RISC、HHI评分值高于对照组(P 0.05)。 结论 治疗性沟通及干预可促进乳腺癌患者的术后康复、增强希望水平,降低心理应激。
[关键词] 乳腺癌;治疗性沟通;术后恢复;心理应激;希望水平
[中图分类号] R47 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2017)04(a)-0177-04
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the effect of therapeutic communication and intervention on postoperative recovery, psychological stress and hope level of patients with breast cancer. Methods 90 patients with breast cancer who underwent surgery in Zigong Third People′s Hospital from January 2012 to January 2016 were divided into observation group (n=45) and control group (n=45) according to random number table. The patients in control group were given to routine nursing and the patients in observation group were given to therapeutic communication and intervention combined with routine nursing. Then postoperative bed time, drainage time, total hospitalization time of two groups were recorded, shoulder joint function was assessed by Neer score; negative emotions were evacuated by self-rating anxiety scale (SAS)and self-rating depression scale (SDS), resiliency was assessed by CD-RISC; hope state was assessed by HHI. Results Postoperative bed time, drainage time and total hospitalization time of observation group were shorter than those of control group (P 0.05). One week after operation, the SAS,SDS,CD-RISC,HHI scores of two groups were better than those before operation; the SAS score and SDS score of observation group were significantly lower than those of control group, and CD-RISC, HHI scores of observation group were significantly higher than those of co
文档评论(0)