“中国文学边缘化”：一个问题史的回溯与确证中国语言文学·文艺学专业论文.docxVIP

万方数据 万方数据 中文摘要 近年来，社会上习惯用“边缘化”评价主流之外的事物，其中就包括文学。“中国 文学边缘化”早在上世纪九十年代就被学界关注，引起重视，但是在使用中往往口号大 过内涵。将“中国文学边缘化”作为核心论题展开论证，是因为本文认为这一理论宣称 已经终结，但仍有必要对其发生、发展与终结进行学理性分析与总结。 从中国现代文学发展史层面入手，利用“媒介博弈”机制，探讨“中国文学边缘化” 的问题史是核心所在。本文提出了三次重大转变：第一次，“南京十年”，中国文学边缘 化处于萌芽阶段，作为中心化的潜流存在；第二次，从“重写年代”到“市场年代”， 中国文学边缘化逐趋形成，文学不再处于意识形态建构的中心地位；第三次，“网络年 代”，中国文学边缘化的终结。 在文章论证结构方面，共分三章：第一章，简介“媒介博弈”机制的理论建构，本 文引入这一概念参与核心论题的论述，是为了拓宽文学分析的维度，希望将一种动态的 交互机制引进文学活动的分析。同时，本章还将进行术语说明，以限定概念表述；第二 章，论述“南京十年”国民党与共产党在意识形态领域争夺过程中，利用文学形成的“媒 介博弈”，讨论“书刊审查制度”对于文学中心化形成的影响，文学边缘化作为一股社 会文化潜流逐渐萌芽，期间一些媒介发展的雏形也影响到了多年之后中国文学的转型； 第三章，论述“中国文学边缘化”的路径，将从“重写文学史”“文学市场化”和“文 学网络化”等方面对“文学边缘化”从形成到终结的路径进行探讨。 【关键词】 文学边缘化；文学中心化；媒介博弈 I Abstract In recent years, the public are accustomed to using the word “peripherization” discuss the things that outside the mainstream, including of literature. The educational circles focused on “Chinese literature peripherization” in the 1990s. But, the significance of slogan transcended the consideration of connotation in use. The reason why I serve the “Chinese literature peripherization” as the central issue is that the allege of theory has ended. However, it’s necessary to analysis and summary the process of beginning, developing, ending more rationally. Starting with the history of Modern Chinese literature, I put forward three important transformations regard to the issue “Chinese literature peripherization” by methodology of Media Game. Firstly, “Nanjing Decade”, as the undercurrent of centralization, “Chinese literature peripherization” was in the stage of sprout. Secondly, from “Rewriting Age” to “Market Age”, “Chinese literature peripherization” engendered gradually when the new sprout was coming out. Literature was no longer the centre of the ideological establishment. Thirdly, “Network Age”, the ending of “Chinese literature peripherization”. From the demonstrative structure, the thesis divides into three chapters. Chapter one, the formulation of “Media Game” theory. In order to broaden dimensionality of