《笔法记》校笺与研究-美术理论专业论文.docxVIP

摘要 荊浩，字浩然，號洪谷子。作為中國山水畫史上的重要畫家，其 有關於山水畫理論的畫論作品《筆法記》歷來就受到相當的關注。《筆 法記》的優點與缺點皆十分突出，一方面文辭竄亂、雅俗混淆，文字 上的諸多問題帶來了理解上的困難和爭議。而同時，其中精到的山水 畫論則于理論和實踐雙方面皆有著重要的指導意義。《筆法記》的特 點使它不僅從畫論的角度，而且從繪畫實踐與文字等角度來看皆具有 相當魅力，相應的，也就吸引到多領域的注意力。 本文由兩個部份組成。前一部份主要是經以傳統版本校勘學方 法，將《筆法記》進行校勘和鑒注。在這部份中，笔者以嘉靖本為底 本，以王氏画苑本、四库全书本，绘事晬编清钞本，佩文斋书画谱本， 绘事微言本，画学心印本等為校本對之進行校勘。箋注方面則主要考 證文中涉及到的一些畫家和畫論，就一些有爭議的句斷略述諸家觀 點，并間附鄙見。后一部份則主要由几篇文章構成，一者闡述《筆法 記》的歷代著錄及研究的情況；再者略考《筆法記》現存諸版本狀況 及其源流問題；其後則將校勘過程中遇到的部份問題以劄記形式略 述；最後討論的是《筆法記》的辨偽問題，其中涉及有影響的前人觀 點，也提出了一些個人看法；同時，作為辨偽的背景與相關材料，此 一文章中也稍涉荊浩的生卒年、作品等方面的問題。 關鍵詞：荊浩 《筆法記》 版本 校勘 辨偽 Abstract Ching Hao,As a pivotal artist in the history of China, his work, Pi-fa-chi ,on the theory of Chinese landscape ,is followed with interest all through the ages. The merits of Pi-fa-chi is as prominent as it’s defects On the one hand, disorder of sentence structure,confusion of formal and informal language ， all those problems bring out difficulties on understanding and controversies as well. On the other hand, his precise theory gets important significance on both theoretical and practical side. All these characters make Pi-fa-chi attractive on both practical and literal point, which gets it lots of attention from every field. The paper is made up by two major parts. The former is armed with means of traditional version textual criticism,do a textual criticism and an annotations on Pi-fa-chi .It simply introduces existing versions and mildly investigate theirs interactions firstly. Then it take Jia-jing’s as the original version, and use Ssu-k’u chüan-shu’s ,Wang-shih hua-yüan’s as proof.etc to do the work. On the annotation, it research some related artists and Theories of painting, describes the viewpoints on Controversial Sentences, and gives my own commentary occasionally . The later consists of two articles. Firstly, it introduces successive dynasties Recording of Pi-fa-chi , Secondly, it discusses the authenticity about Pi-fa-chi, which related to viewpoints and puts forward my ideas. On the