延续护理对居家脑卒中吞咽障碍患者影响分析.docVIP

延续护理对居家脑卒中吞咽障碍患者影响分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
延续护理对居家脑卒中吞咽障碍患者影响分析

延续护理对居家脑卒中吞咽障碍患者影响分析   [摘要] 目的 研究延续护理对居家脑卒中吞咽障碍患者的影响。方法 随机选取96例于2011年2月―2012年8月间就诊的脑卒中吞咽障碍患者,将其分为对照组和观察组,各48例。对照组实施常规护理,观察组在常规护理基础上进行6个月的延续护理干预。出院后定期随访,于入院前、出院时、出院1个月、2个月、4个月、6个月时对患者进行饮水试验评估患者吞咽功能,同时记录并发症发生情况,比较组间差异。 结果 ①研究发现,入院前、出院时两组患者饮水试验评分差异无统计学意义,出院后两组患者评分开始降低,吞咽功能改善,出院1个月时组间比较差异无统计学意义,出院2、4、6个月时观察组评分明显低于对照组,P0.05,差异有统计学意义。②6个月后,观察组吸入性肺炎、误吸、呛咳发生率明显低于对照组,两组总发生率分别为14.6%、89.6%,P0.05,差异有统计学意义。结论 延续护理可有效改善居家脑卒中吞咽障碍,并发症发生率明显降低,值得临床借鉴。   [关键词] 延续护理;脑卒中;吞咽障碍   [中图分类号] R47 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2016)08(a)-0168-04   [Abstract] Objective To study the clinical effect of continuous nursing care on patients with dysphagia after stroke. Methods 96 patients in February 2011 to August 2012 with dysphagia after stroke were selected and divided them into study group and control group. Routine nursing for control group, while observation group in the conventional care based on the continuation of care, for a period of 6 months. Regular follow-up after discharge, and drinking water test was conducted to evaluate the swallowing function of patients before and after discharge, 1 months, 2 months, 4 months and 6 months after discharge. The complications were recorded and the differences were compared between the two groups. Results ①The study found that there were no significant difference of water test score of patients in the two groups when eprior to admission and discharge. Scores of two groups began to decrease after discharge.There was no significant difference between the two groups at 1 months, the score of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group in 2 months, 4 months and 6 months,P 0.05, the difference was significant.②After 6 months, the incidence of aspiration pneumonia, aspiration and cough in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the total incidence rate of the two groups was 14.6%, 89.6%, P 0.05, the difference was significant. Conclusion Continuous nursing can effectively improv

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

151****1926 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档