史记三家注与汉书颜注对比分析-comparative analysis of records of the historians three annotations and han dynastys yan annotations.docxVIP

摘 要 摘 要 《史记》三家注与《汉书》颜注堪称史注典范，向来为治先唐文史哲者与古籍整理 者所宝重。两书广征博引，倍受后世推举。惜鲜有对两书相关内容①作比堪对照工作。 本文就《史》、《汉》两书相关内容从以下五方面提出己见，以为引玉。 一、绪论。对本课题的研究历史、现状作简要介绍，并简述本文的研究方法 及思路。 二、《史记》三家注与《汉书》颜注略说。对《史记》、《史记》三家注、《汉书》 和《汉书》颜注的基本情况以及《史记》三家注与《汉书》颜注对比研究的可行性 进行说明。 三、两书相关内容存在的差异。本章是论文的重点部分，对于两书相关内容从 释义差异和注音差异两个方面来展开论述。 四、两书相关内容差异的原因分析。本文把导致两书相关内容差异的原因归纳 为两大因素：传抄因素和注释者主观因素。 五、两书相关内容对比研究的意义。（一）疏通注文有助于对文本的解读；（二） 纠正失误并为训诂学、校勘学提供研究素材；（三）为辞书编纂与修订提供有价值的 材料；（四）对语音学、词汇学及相关学科研究有重要的参考价值。 关键词 《史记》三家注 《汉书》颜注 相关内容 差异 ① “相关内容”是指同一被释词语同一注者的训释。同一注者对同一词语的训释本应是相同的， 但是，由于种种原因，两书注文相关内容却存有程度不同的差异。 I Abstract Abstract It is known that Shi Ji San Jia Zhu and Han Shu Yan Zhu are the classic books with notes. These two books are not only cherished by researchers who are interested in the ancient materials of Pre-Tang dynasty but also get the love of scholars who sort up history books. And the rich contents get much acclaim, however, there are few comparative studies of the related contents① of these two books. Therefore, the author plans to examines their notes from five aspects: The first chapter introduces the previous and contemporary researches of this study, giving the methodology this study adopts and the organization of this thesis. Chapter two mainly gives a general introduction of Shi Ji, Shi Ji San Jia Zhu , Han Shu, Han Shu Yan Zhu. And it also discusses the feasibility of the comparative study of these two books. The third chapter is the body of this thesis. It mainly examines the differences of related content from two perspectives: noted meaning differences and spelling differences. In chapter four, it explores the reasons why there are the differences of related content about these two books, including the copying factor and the subjective factor of noters. The last chapter points out the significance of this contrast study. Firstly, it can help readers better understand these two books. Moreover, it provides a good resource for exegetics and textual criticism. Thirdly, it provides valuable materials for