中国刑事立法语言模糊性研究——以法律演变为视角-a study on the vagueness of chinese criminal legislation language —— from the perspective of legal evolution.docxVIP

下载本文档

10
0
约11.75万字
约 59页
2018-09-08 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

中国刑事立法语言模糊性研究——以法律演变为视角-a study on the vagueness of chinese criminal legislation language —— from the perspective of legal evolution.docx

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

中国刑事立法语言模糊性研究——以法律演变为视角-a study on the vagueness of chinese criminal legislation language —— from the perspective of legal evolution

PAGE PAGE 10 CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION Motivation of the study Interest in the studies concerning the legislative language of Chinese laws has been greatly aroused up to now for multiple reasons. Firstly, the legal system, which was once attacked and destroyed during the so-called “cultural revolution” period, was restored in 1979. Since then, a great deal of legislation such as the Criminal Act of the PRC (1979), the General Principles of Civil Law of the PRC (adopted in 1986), the Contract Act of PRC (adopted in 1999), etc., has been promulgated with no efforts spared. Secondly, rule of law has been gradually reestablished in China by stressing some important concepts and spirits such as “administering a country according to law”, “supremacy of law”, “limitation of powers” , “safeguarding citizens’ rights”, etc. Thirdly, China’s accession to the WTO in 2001 means that the Republic has to revise relevant legal provisions which are not in line with the requirements of the WTO and make laws that are of necessity in accordance with the agreements reached and the promises made by China when applying for accession to the WTO. The subject matters as regulated by law cover every aspect of our daily life while language is the carrier and embodiment of law, which makes the studies of legislative language enjoy a great status in the ambit of language researches. Therefore, it is of great importance to conduct the present research in the legislative language. Ever since the notion of “Fuzzy Sets” was raised by L.A Zadeh in 1965, studies of vagueness began to emerge in many fields such as mathematics, logics, linguistics as well as law with fruitful achievements. Vagueness of the legislative language has now attracted much more concern and attention than ever before. Although precision and definiteness is still the prime goal of the legislative language, vagueness, which is the other side of the coin, has also been well recognized and accepted. Vagueness is one of the most