循证护理在急性心肌梗死并发心律失常护理中应用价值分析.docVIP

循证护理在急性心肌梗死并发心律失常护理中应用价值分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
循证护理在急性心肌梗死并发心律失常护理中应用价值分析

循证护理在急性心肌梗死并发心律失常护理中应用价值分析   [摘要] 目的 探?急性心肌梗死并发心律失常患者行循证护理模式的效果,评定临床应用价值。 方法 选取本院2015年2月~2016年2月期间所收治的急性心肌梗死并发心律失常患者60例。依据随机数字表法的分组形式将其分为实验组和对照组,各30例。两组患者均行基础护理模式,在此基础上,实验组患者给予行循证护理模式,对比两组患者的住院时间、休息时间、心律失常发生率以及满意度等指标。 结果 实验组的卧床休息时间(2.95±0.75)d、住院时间(11.08±1.04)d,短于对照组(3.55±0.60)d、(13.02±2.10)d,组间比较差异统计学意义(t=3.4215、4.5343,P0.05);实验组心律失常发生率为16.7%,少于对照组的60.0%,差异有统计学意义。实验组总满意率为93.3%,显著优于对照组73.3%,组间比较差异统计学意义(χ2=4.3200,P0.05)。 结论 将循证护理模式应用于急性心肌梗死并发心律失常患者中,能够有效提升患者的满意度,同时降低并发症发生率,值得临床进一步应用和探索。   [关键词] 急性心肌梗死;心律失常;循证护理模式;效果分析   [中图分类号] R473.6 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2017)27-0141-03   Analysis on the application value of evidence-based nursing in the nursing of acute myocardial infarction complicated with arrhythmia   ZHENG Huimin   Department of Internal Medicine, Heze Third Peoples Hospital in Shandong Province, Heze 274000, China   [Abstract] Objective To analyze the effect of evidence-based nursing model in the patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with arrhythmia and to evaluate the clinical application value. Methods 60 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with arrhythmia who were admitted to our hospital from February 2015 to February 2016 were selected. According to the random number table method, the patients were evenly divided into experimental group and control group, with 30 patients in each group. Both groups of patients were given basic nursing model. On this basis, the experimental group was further given evidence-based nursing model. Indicators including length of hospital stay, rest time, incidence rate of arrhythmia and satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The rest time was(2.95±0.75) d, length of hospital stay was(11.08±1.04) d in the experimental group, which were shorter than those of (3.55±0.60) d and (13.02±2.10)d in the control group. The difference between groups was statistically significant (t=3.4215, 4.5343, P   [Key words] Acute myocardial infarction; Arrhythmia; Evidence-based nu

文档评论(0)

317960162 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档