彩色多普勒超声高频浅表小器官联合腔内探头对肛周脓肿诊断价值.docVIP

彩色多普勒超声高频浅表小器官联合腔内探头对肛周脓肿诊断价值.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
彩色多普勒超声高频浅表小器官联合腔内探头对肛周脓肿诊断价值

彩色多普勒超声高频浅表小器官联合腔内探头对肛周脓肿诊断价值   [摘要] 目的 研究联合应用彩色多普勒超声高频浅表小器官及腔内探头对肛周脓肿的诊断价值。 方法 选取2013年8月~2014年8月本院收治的78例经病理证实为肛周脓肿患者的临床资料,根据数字随机分组法原则,将患者分为两组,每组各39例。对照组给予常规专科检查(彩超检测),观察组联合应用高频浅表小器官及腔内探头检查,比较两种检测方式的检测结果。 结果 ①观察组患者与括约肌关系符合、支管符合、主管符合、内口符合率均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P0.05)。②观察组肛周脓肿检出率为97.44%,对照组肛周脓肿检出率为82.05%,观察组肛周脓肿检出率较对照组升高,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。③观察组肛瘘检出率为94.44%,高于对照组(75.00%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 联合使用高频浅表小器官与腔内探头检查,能够提高肛周脓肿的检出率,诊断价值非常高,便于为疾病的治疗提供依据,值得临床推广应用。   [关键词] 高频浅表小器官;腔内探头;肛周脓肿   [中图分类号] R445.1 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2015)05(c)-0059-03   [Abstract] Objective To study the diagnostic value of combination of high-frequency small superficial organs by color Doppler ultrasound and intracavitary probe on perianal abscess. Methods From August 2013 to August 2014,clinical data from 78 cases diagnosed as perianal abscess by pathology were admitted into our hospital.According to random number table,they were divided into two groups.In control group,conventional specialist examinations like ultrasound detection was provided,while in observation group,high-frequency small superficial organs combining with intracavitary probe was applied.The detection outcomes by two methods were compared. Results In the observation group,coincidence rates of sphincter relationship,branch pipe,principal pine and inlet were all higher than those in the control group,with statistical differences (P0.05).Detection rate of perianal abscess in the observation group was 97.44%,while in the control group,the rate was 82.05%.The detection rate of perianal abscess in the observation group was higher with a statistical difference (P0.05).The detection rate of anal fistula in the observation group (94.44%) was higher than that in the control group (75.00%),with a statistical difference (P0.05). Conclusion The combined use of high-frequency small superficial organs and intracavitary probe can improve the detection rate of perianal abscess.It is high in its diagnostic vale and convenient to provide reference

文档评论(0)

bokegood + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档