- 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
慢性支气管炎肺气肿患者负性情绪及睡眠质量有效护理方法
慢性支气管炎肺气肿患者负性情绪及睡眠质量有效护理方法
[摘要] 目的 研究?τ诼?性支气管炎合并肺气肿患者提供优质护理服务的应用效果。方法 方便选取该院于2014年5―12月间收治的40例慢性支气管炎、肺气肿患者,作为常规组,为患者提供疾病药物治疗及常规院内护理服务,于2015年1―7月间收治40例患者,作为观察组,为患者提供早期护理干预措施,重点加强心理护理服务,总结两组患者经护理干预前后心理焦虑(SAS)评分,对比两组患者睡眠质量评分,总结患者生活质量评分。结果 两组患者入院时均接受SAS焦虑评分,结果对比差异无统计学意义(P0.05);经护理干预后,再次测评,观察组患者评分为(45.04±1.05)分,低于常规组(56.03±1.06)分,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组患者入院时,两组患者评分均较高,睡眠状态较差,经护理干预后,观察组患者评分为(7.60±0.46)分,低于常规组(13.02±0.38)分,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。常规组患者交流为(14.03±1.00)分、户外活动为(13.01±1.02)分、家庭融入度为(15.23±1.01)分、机体健康状态为(15.49±1.08)分;观察组上述指标评分分别为(23.50±0.40)分、(22.54±0.38)分、(22.41±0.21)分、(22.00±0.39)分。均高于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 为慢性支气管炎、肺气肿患者住院治疗期间提供早期护理干预措施,大部分患者心理焦虑改善较好,且睡眠质量较好,患者生活质量评分较好。
[关键词] 慢性支气管炎;肺气肿;负性情绪;睡眠质量;并发症
[中图分类号] R473.12 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2017)03(b)-0167-03
[Abstract] Objective To research the application effect of excellent nursing service for patients with chronic bronchitis and emphysema. Methods 40 cases of patients with chronic bronchitis and emphysema admitted and treated in our hospital from May to December 2014 were convenient selected as the routine group and were give the disease drug treatment and routine hospital nursing service, and 40 cases of patients admitted and treated in our hospital from January to July 2015 were selected as the observation group and were given the early nursing intervention measures, and the mental nursing services were especially enhanced, and the SAS scores before and after nursing intervention of the two groups were summarized and the sleep quality score was compared between the two groups and the quality of life score of patients was summarized. Results The difference in the SAS score between the two groups at admission had no statistical significance(P0.05), after nursing intervention, the SAS score in the observation group was lower than that in the routine group[(45.04±1.05)points vs (56.03±1.06)points], the admission had statistical significance(P [Key words] Chronic bronchitis; Emphysema; Negative emotion; S
文档评论(0)