- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
探讨耳内镜在经耳道鼓膜修补术中应用效果
探讨耳内镜在经耳道鼓膜修补术中应用效果
DOI:10.16662/j.cnki.1674-0742.2017.25.086
[摘要] 目的 探讨耳内镜在经耳道鼓膜修补术中的应用效果。方法 方便选取2015年1月―2016年12月该院收治的80例鼓膜穿孔患者作为研究对象。采用随机数字表法将其分为观察组与对照组,对照组40例接受显微镜下鼓膜修补术,观察组40例患者则采用耳内镜进行鼓膜修补术,比较两组患者治疗效果及手术相关指标。结果 观察组患者治疗后总有效率(97.50%)明显高于对照组(72.50%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组患者平均手术用时[(10.9±4.2)min vs (36.9±4.5)min]、术中出血量[(7.0±3.1)mL vs (17.3±3.4)mL]以及住院时间[(3.5±1.1)d vs (7.6±2.5)d]均明?@低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 耳内镜下经耳道鼓膜修补术治疗鼓膜穿孔疗效优于传统显微镜下鼓膜修补术,患者术中出血量更低,术后康复速度更快,具有临床应用及推广价值。
[关键词] 耳内镜;经耳道鼓膜修补术;鼓膜穿孔;临床疗效
[中图分类号] R764.23 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2017)09(a)-0086-03
Exploration of the Application Effect of Endoscopy in the Repair of Ear Canal Tympanic Membrane
DING Jian-hui
Department of Otolaryngology, the People’s Hospital of Dianjiang County, Chongqing, 408300 China
[Abstract] Objective This paper tries to explore the application of endoscopy in the treatment of ear canal tympanic membrane. Methods Convenient selection 80 cases of tympanic membrane perforation in this hospital from January 2015 to December 2016 were selected as the research objects and were divided into the observation group and the control group according to the random number table method. 40 cases in the control group received microscopical tympanostomy, 40 cases in the observation group received endoscopy tympanostomy, and then the curative effect and related operation indexes of the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate in the observation group after treatment was 97.50%, significantly higher than the control group of 72.50%,with statistical significance(P0.05); the average operation time of the observation group and the control group was[(10.9±4.2)minutes vs (36.9±4.5)minutes], intraoperative bleeding was[(7.0±3.1)mL vs (17.3±3.4)mL and hospitalization time was[(3.5±1.1)days vs (7.6±2.5)days], significantly lower than the control group, with statistical significance(P0.05). Conclusion The treatment of tympanic membrane perforation through ear canal resect
文档评论(0)